CVE-2021-25634
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLibreOffice supports digital signatures of ODF documents and macros within documents, presenting visual aids that no alteration of the document occurred since the last signing and that the signature is valid. An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in LibreOffice allowed an attacker to modify a digitally signed ODF document to insert an additional signing time timestamp which LibreOffice would incorrectly present as a valid signature signed at the bogus signing time. This issue affects: The Document Foundation LibreOffice 7-0 versions prior to 7.0.6; 7-1 versions prior to 7.1.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLibreOffice has an improper certificate validation vulnerability in its digital signature handling for ODF documents. An attacker can modify a signed document to insert a bogus signing time timestamp, which LibreOffice will incorrectly validate and present as a legitimate signature timestamp, undermining the integrity of digitally signed documents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.0>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.6>= 7.1.0, < 7.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed LibreOffice versionOpen LibreOffice, go to Help > About LibreOffice. Alternatively, run 'libreoffice --version' from command line. On Debian, also check with 'dpkg -l | grep libreoffice'Affected if The version is 7.0.0 through 7.0.5.x, or 7.1.0 through 7.1.1.x
-
Verify the document-signing module is in useCheck if users work with signed ODF documents (.odt, .ods, .odp files) by reviewing recent file access or asking users about digital signature workflowsAffected if Signed ODF documents are processed and the LibreOffice version falls within the affected range
-
Inspect signature validation behaviorOpen a signed ODF document in LibreOffice, right-click the signature, and check the signature panel. Look for the timestamp displayed. Compare it against the actual signature certificate propertiesAffected if A timestamp is shown in the signature details but the version is in the vulnerable range, indicating incorrect timestamp validation may be occurring
You are affected if LibreOffice version is 7.0.0-7.0.5 or 7.1.0-7.1.1 and you validate digital signatures on ODF documents.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.67.1.2
Upgrade LibreOffice to version 7.0.6 or later (for 7-0 branch) or 7.1.2 or later (for 7-1 branch). Verify that digital signature functionality works correctly after the upgrade.
LibreOffice 7.0.6 or later in the 7.0.x series; LibreOffice 7.1.2 or later in the 7.1.x series
- For Debian Linux 11.0: Run 'apt update' followed by 'apt install --only-upgrade libreoffice' to upgrade to the patched version available in Debian repositories
- For other Linux distributions: Use your distribution's package manager to update LibreOffice (e.g., 'sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade libreoffice' on Ubuntu)
- Alternatively, download LibreOffice 7.0.6 or later (or 7.1.2 or later) from the official LibreOffice website and install manually
- After upgrade, verify the installed version by opening LibreOffice and going to Help > About LibreOffice, or run 'libreoffice --version' from command line
- Ensure the version shown is 7.0.6 or later in the 7.0.x series, or 7.1.2 or later in the 7.1.x series
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-25634 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-25634 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data