CVE-2021-25749
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWindows workloads can run as ContainerAdministrator even when those workloads set the runAsNonRoot option to true.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn Kubernetes clusters with Windows worker nodes, the security context option runAsNonRoot is not properly enforced. When set to true, this option is intended to prevent containers from running as root. However, Windows containers bypass this setting and run as ContainerAdministrator (equivalent to root on Windows), allowing workloads to execute with elevated privileges despite the runAsNonRoot configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.20.0, <= 1.21.0>= 1.22.0, < 1.22.14>= 1.23.0, < 1.23.11>= 1.24.0, < 1.24.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Kubernetes control plane versionRun 'kubectl version --short' or 'kubectl get nodes' to identify the API server and controller manager versionsAffected if The Kubernetes version falls within >= 1.20.0 <= 1.21.0, >= 1.22.0 < 1.22.14, >= 1.23.0 < 1.23.11, or >= 1.24.0 < 1.24.5
-
Identify Windows worker nodesRun 'kubectl get nodes -o jsonpath="{.items[?(@.status.nodeInfo.osImage!='')].metadata.name},{.items[?(@.status.nodeInfo.osImage!='')].status.nodeInfo.osImage}"' and look for Windows Server in the outputAffected if The cluster contains Windows worker nodes running Windows containers
-
Find pods with runAsNonRoot enabled on Windows containersReview pod specs: run 'kubectl get pods --all-namespaces -o json' and search for containers where securityContext.runAsNonRoot is set to true and the nodeSelector includes Windows or the container image is Windows-basedAffected if Pods exist with runAsNonRoot: true configured for Windows containers
-
Verify actual container user privilege levelExec into a Windows container and run 'whoami /groups' or check the effective user ID from within the container using 'id' commandAffected if The container runs as ContainerAdministrator or shows elevated privileges despite runAsNonRoot being set to true
The environment is affected if the Kubernetes version is in the affected range, the cluster has Windows worker nodes, and Windows pods are configured with runAsNonRoot: true but actually run with elevated ContainerAdministrator privileges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.22.141.23.111.24.5
Ensure Windows workloads do not require ContainerAdministrator privileges. Review and enforce non-root user configurations through alternative security controls such as pod security policies/admissions, node selectors to Linux, or application redesign to avoid Windows admin requirements. Consider upgrading Kubernetes to versions that address this enforcement gap.
Kubernetes 1.22.14, 1.23.11, or 1.24.5 (depending on your current minor version)
- 1. Identify the current Kubernetes cluster version by running: kubectl version --short or checking the control plane nodes
- 2. Plan the upgrade path: if on 1.20.x or 1.21.x, upgrade to 1.21.11 or later; if on 1.22.x, upgrade to 1.22.14; if on 1.23.x, upgrade to 1.23.11; if on 1.24.x, upgrade to 1.24.5
- 3. Review Kubernetes release notes for your target version to check for breaking changes and API deprecations
- 4. Backup etcd data and cluster state before initiating the upgrade
- 5. Upgrade the control plane nodes first, following your cluster's upgrade procedure (e.g., kubeadm upgrade apply for kubeadm clusters)
- 6. Upgrade worker nodes after control plane is healthy
- 7. Verify the upgrade completed successfully: kubectl get nodes and confirm all nodes show the new version
- 8. For Windows workloads, verify that the runAsNonRoot setting is properly enforced by deploying a test pod with runAsNonRoot: true and confirming it does not run as ContainerAdministrator
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-25749 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-25749 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data