CVE-2021-27208
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen booting a Zync-7000 SOC device from nand flash memory, the nand driver in the ROM does not validate the inputs when reading in any parameters in the nand’s parameter page. IF a field read in from the parameter page is too large, this causes a buffer overflow that could lead to arbitrary code execution. Physical access and modification of the board assembly on which the Zynq-7000 SoC device mounted is needed to replace the original NAND flash memory with a NAND flash emulation device for this attack to be successful.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the Zynq-7000 SoC ROM NAND driver where parameters read from the NAND flash parameter page are not validated for size, allowing an oversized field to overflow and enable arbitrary code execution during boot.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Zynq-7000 hardware platformReview device documentation, schematics, or boot configuration settings to confirm the SoC is either Xilinx Zynq-7000 or Zynq-7000s. Check the device tree or hardware identification registers if accessible.Affected if The device is not a Zynq-7000 or Zynq-7000s series SoC, then this CVE does not apply.
-
Verify NAND boot mode is enabledInspect the boot mode settings or boot configuration registers (e.g., BSPI registers, boot mode pins) to determine if the device is configured to boot from NAND flash. Check the primary boot device setting in the boot header or boot ROM configuration.Affected if The device uses NAND flash as the boot source, making the NAND driver ROM code active during early boot.
-
Inspect NAND parameter page configurationRead the NAND flash parameter page (ONFI parameter page) stored on the NAND device. This is typically located at a fixed offset in the NAND flash (often block 0, page 0 or similar). Use NAND flash reader tools or check the boot image for embedded NAND parameters.Affected if The NAND parameter page contains fields (such as model number, manufacturer ID, or other variable-length fields) that could exceed the expected buffer size in the ROM driver.
-
Check for custom or oversized NAND parametersExamine the NAND parameter page data for unusually long ASCII strings or fields that extend beyond their defined boundaries in the ONFI specification. Compare field lengths against ROM driver buffer expectations.Affected if Any field in the NAND parameter page is larger than what the ROM NAND driver expects, indicating potential buffer overflow condition.
If the device is a Zynq-7000 or Zynq-7000s using NAND flash boot mode with a NAND parameter page containing oversized fields, the device is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution during boot.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict physical access to devices; if NAND boot is not required, disable NAND boot mode and use alternative boot sources; implement secure boot if available to validate firmware integrity.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-27208 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-27208 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data