Cmsis RtosOperating system · Arm

CVE-2021-27431

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-05-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.1.3 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
ARM CMSIS RTOS2 versions prior to 2.1.3 are vulnerable to integer wrap-around inosRtxMemoryAlloc (local malloc equivalent) function, which can lead to arbitrary memory allocation, resulting in unexpected behavior such as a crash or injected code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

ARM CMSIS RTOS2 versions prior to 2.1.3 contain an integer wrap-around vulnerability in the osRtxMemoryAlloc function (the RTOS's memory allocation equivalent). This flaw allows an attacker to trigger arbitrary memory allocations through specially crafted requests that cause integer overflow, potentially leading to memory corruption, crashes, or arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUpgrade to CMSIS RTOS2 version 2.1.3 or later which contains the fix for the integer wrap-around. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement严格的输入验证和边界检查 around memory allocation requests to mitigate exploitation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cmsis RtosOperating system
Affected:<= 2.1.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify CMSIS RTOS2 version
    Locate the version header file in your CMSIS RTOS2 installation. Common paths include: CMSIS/OS/RTOS2/Include/os_version.h or similar version header files within the CMSIS pack. Open the file and find the version definition (often named __CMSIS_RTOS_VERSION or similar numeric version macro).
    Affected if The version number found is less than 2.1.3 (e.g., 2.1.2, 2.1.1, 2.1.0, or earlier)
  2. Verify dynamic memory allocation is enabled
    Examine your project configuration or source files for the RTOS memory pool settings. In CMSIS RTOS2, the memory allocation is controlled by the osRtxConfig.h or equivalent configuration header. Look for definitions such as osRtxMemoryAlloc or OS_LIB_MEM_DYNAMIC.
    Affected if Dynamic memory allocation is enabled (osRtxMemoryAlloc function is present and being used in the build)
  3. Check for osRtxMemoryAlloc usage in codebase
    Search your project source files for calls to osMemoryAlloc, osRtxMemoryAlloc, or related memory allocation functions from the RTOS. Also check if your project links against the CMSIS RTOS2 library that contains the vulnerable function.
    Affected if Your application code or linked libraries call osRtxMemoryAlloc or other CMSIS RTOS2 memory allocation functions

You are affected if your CMSIS RTOS2 version is 2.1.3 or earlier AND your project uses dynamic memory allocation through the osRtxMemoryAlloc function.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.1.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to CMSIS RTOS2 version 2.1.3 or later which contains the fix for the integer wrap-around. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement严格的输入验证和边界检查 around memory allocation requests to mitigate exploitation.

Recommended fix High confidence

CMSIS RTOS2 version 2.1.3

  1. 1. Identify all instances of ARM CMSIS RTOS2 in your project dependencies
  2. 2. Locate the CMSIS RTOS2 package configuration (typically in a package.json, CMSIS pack manifest, or build system configuration)
  3. 3. Update the CMSIS RTOS2 version specification to 2.1.3 or later
  4. 4. Rebuild the project to incorporate the updated library
  5. 5. Verify the build completes successfully and test the application to ensure proper RTOS functionality

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Cmsis Rtos Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-27431 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-27431 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data