CVE-2021-27631
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSAP NetWeaver ABAP Server and ABAP Platform (Enqueue Server), versions - KRNL32NUC - 7.22,7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC - 7.22,7.22EXT,7.49, KRNL64UC - 8.04,7.22,7.22EXT,7.49,7.53,7.73, KERNEL - 7.22,8.04,7.49,7.53,7.73, allows an unauthenticated attacker without specific knowledge of the system to send a specially crafted packet over a network which will trigger an internal error in the system due to improper input validation in method EnqConvUniToSrvReq() causing the system to crash and rendering it unavailable. In this attack, no data in the system can be viewed or modified.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSAP NetWeaver ABAP Server Enqueue Server contains improper input validation in method EnqConvUniToSrvReq(). An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet to trigger an internal error, causing the Enqueue Server to crash and making the system unavailable. No data exfiltration or modification is possible.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= kernel_7.22= kernel_7.49= kernel_7.53= kernel_7.73= kernel_7.77= kernel_7.81= kernel_7.82= kernel_7.83= kernel_8.04= krnl32nuc_7.22= krnl32nuc_7.22ext= krnl64nuc_7.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify the Enqueue Server component is runningCheck if the Enqueue Server (ENQREP) process is active on the SAP system. In ABAP, this can be verified via transaction SMENQ or by checking process list for enqueue server processes (enserver.exe or similar).Affected if The Enqueue Server process is running and exposed to network traffic
-
Identify the SAP kernel versionOn the SAP application server, check the kernel version by examining the executable version of the enqueue server binary (enserver.exe on Windows or enserver on Unix). The version is typically displayed in the binary's properties or via command line version flag.Affected if Kernel version matches one of the affected versions: 7.22, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.77, 7.81, 7.82, 7.83, 8.04 (for kernel_7* and kernel_8*), or 7.22, 7.22ext (for krnl32nuc and krnl64nuc variants)
-
Confirm kernel variant matches affected typesIdentify the specific kernel type running (kernel_7*, kernel_8*, krnl32nuc, krnl64nuc) and cross-reference with the affected versions list provided in the CVE.Affected if The kernel variant and version combination appears in the CVE-affected version list
-
Check network exposure of Enqueue Server portVerify that the Enqueue Server port (calculated as 32 + system_id, typically port 3298 for system ID 00) is accessible from untrusted networks. Use netstat or firewall rules to identify listening ports and their exposure.Affected if The Enqueue Server port is exposed to untrusted or public network segments
The system is affected if the Enqueue Server is running AND the SAP kernel version falls within the listed vulnerable versions (7.22, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.77, 7.81, 7.82, 7.83, 8.04 for kernel variants) AND the Enqueue Server port is accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply SAP Security Notes to patch the vulnerable Enqueue Server kernel. Additionally, restrict network access to the Enqueue Server port (typically port 32<system_id> + 98) using firewalls or ACLs to limit exposure to untrusted networks.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-27631 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-27631 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data