CVE-2021-27634
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSAP NetWeaver AS for ABAP (RFC Gateway), versions - KRNL32NUC - 7.22,7.22EXT, KRNL64NUC - 7.22,7.22EXT,7.49, KRNL64UC - 8.04,7.22,7.22EXT,7.49,7.53,7.73, KERNEL - 7.22,8.04,7.49,7.53,7.73,7.77,7.81,7.82,7.83, allows an unauthenticated attacker without specific knowledge of the system to send a specially crafted packet over a network which will trigger an internal error in the system due to improper input validation in method ThCpicDtCreate () causing the system to crash and rendering it unavailable. In this attack, no data in the system can be viewed or modified.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSAP NetWeaver RFC Gateway contains an improper input validation vulnerability in the ThCpicDtCreate() method. An unauthenticated attacker can send a specially crafted packet over the network that triggers an internal error, causing the ABAP system to crash and become unavailable. This is a Denial of Service vulnerability with no data exfiltration or modification capability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= kernel_7.22= kernel_7.49= kernel_7.53= kernel_7.73= kernel_8.04= krnl32nuc_7.22= krnl32nuc_7.22ext= krnl64nuc_7.22= krnl64nuc_7.22ext= krnl64nuc_7.49= krnl64uc_7.22= krnl64uc_7.22extCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SAP kernel versionUse SAP transaction SM51 to view the kernel release and patch level, or check the kernel executables on the application server (typically in /sapmnt/<SID>/exe or /usr/sap/<SID>/SYS/exe/run). The kernel version will appear as a release number like 7.22, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, or 8.04.Affected if The kernel version matches one of the affected versions: kernel_7.22, kernel_7.49, kernel_7.53, kernel_7.73, kernel_8.04, krnl32nuc_7.22, krnl32nuc_7.22ext, krnl64nuc_7.22, krnl64nuc_7.22ext, krnl64nuc_7.49, krnl64uc_7.22, or krnl64uc_7.22ext.
-
Verify the RFC Gateway is runningCheck if the RFC Gateway process (gwrd) is active on the SAP system. This can be done via transaction SM51 (process list) or by checking for the gateway process on the operating system.Affected if The RFC Gateway process is running and listening on network ports (typically sapgw00-sapgw99).
-
Confirm network exposure of RFC Gateway portsUse netstat or ss commands to list listening ports. Look for ports in the sapgw* range (commonly 3300 for sapgw00, 3301 for sapgw01, etc.). Determine if these ports are bound to external interfaces or exposed to untrusted networks.Affected if The RFC Gateway ports are listening on external/accessible network interfaces and reachable from untrusted networks.
You are affected if your SAP system runs a kernel version matching the listed affected versions AND the RFC Gateway is exposed on accessible network ports.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant SAP Security Note to update the kernel patches. Implement network-level filtering to restrict unauthorized packets to the RFC Gateway ports as a compensating control until the patch can be applied.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-27634 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-27634 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data