Bigfix ComplianceApplication · Hcltech

CVE-2021-27756

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-03-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.0.6 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
"TLS-RSA cipher suites are not disabled in BigFix Compliance up to v2.0.5. If TLS 2.0 and secure ciphers are not enabled then an attacker can passively record traffic and later decrypt it."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

BigFix Compliance up to v2.0.5 does not disable weak TLS-RSA cipher suites, and if TLS 1.2 with secure ciphers is not enforced, an attacker with passive network access can capture encrypted traffic and decrypt it offline using attacks against the weak RSA-based ciphers.

MitigationEnable TLS 1.2 with strong cipher suites (such as AES-GCM) and explicitly disable all TLS-RSA cipher suites in the BigFix Compliance server configuration.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Bigfix ComplianceApplication
Affected:>= 2.0, < 2.0.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check BigFix Compliance installed version
    Locate the BigFix Compliance installation and retrieve its version number (typically found in the product UI, registry, or installation directory). Compare it to the affected range: version 2.0.0 through 2.0.5 are vulnerable.
    Affected if Installed version is 2.0.0 through 2.0.5 (version 2.0.6 and later are patched).
  2. Verify TLS 1.2 enforcement configuration
    Access the BigFix Compliance server configuration and check whether TLS 1.2 is explicitly enforced as the minimum TLS version.
    Affected if TLS 1.2 is NOT enforced, or older TLS versions (1.0/1.1) are still permitted.
  3. Inspect enabled cipher suites
    Review the BigFix Compliance server configuration for the list of enabled TLS cipher suites. Identify which ciphers are configured for TLS connections.
    Affected if Weak RSA-based cipher suites (such as TLS_RSA_WITH_* ciphers) are present in the enabled cipher list.
  4. Confirm RSA cipher exclusion
    Check the configuration to determine whether TLS-RSA cipher suites have been explicitly disabled or removed from the allowed cipher list.
    Affected if TLS-RSA ciphers are NOT explicitly disabled, or strong AES-GCM ciphers are not prioritized.

You are affected if you run BigFix Compliance version 2.0.0-2.0.5 AND TLS 1.2 is not enforced AND weak RSA-based cipher suites remain enabled in your configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.0.6 or later
Fixed in 2.0.6
Interim mitigation

Enable TLS 1.2 with strong cipher suites (such as AES-GCM) and explicitly disable all TLS-RSA cipher suites in the BigFix Compliance server configuration.

Recommended fix High confidence

BigFix Compliance 2.0.6

  1. Download BigFix Compliance version 2.0.6 or later from HCL/BigFix official vendor support site (support.hcltechsw.com)
  2. Review HCL BigFix Compliance upgrade documentation for version 2.0.6
  3. Ensure backup of current BigFix Compliance configuration and data
  4. Apply the upgrade to BigFix Compliance following vendor-provided upgrade procedures
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful and TLS-RSA cipher suites are disabled in the updated configuration
  6. Confirm TLS 1.2 or higher with secure cipher suites is enabled
Caveat Upgrade within minor version should be low-risk but test in non-production environment first

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Bigfix Compliance Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,920
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-27756 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-27756 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data