CVE-2021-27772
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUsers are able to read group conversations without actively taking part in them. Next to one to one conversations, users are able to start group conversations with multiple users. It was found possible to obtain the contents of these group conversations without being part of it. This could lead to information leakage where confidential information discussed in private groups is read by other users without the users knowledge.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA broken access control vulnerability in the group messaging functionality allows users to read the contents of group conversations they are not members of, enabling unauthorized access to private group discussions and resulting in information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Sametime installation and versionLocate the Sametime installation directory (typically under /opt/hcl/sametime or C:\Program Files\HCL\Sametime) and check the version manifest or about page. On Linux, run: find /opt -name '*.version' -o -name 'version.properties' 2>/dev/null | xargs grep -i '11.6'Affected if The installed version is exactly 11.6 (exact match)
-
Confirm group messaging module is activeAccess the Sametime administrative console or check the server configuration for the sametime-group-messaging or equivalent service component. Look for enabled status in the services.xml or mgservice.xml configuration file.Affected if Group messaging service is installed and enabled on the server
-
Verify conversation access controls existExamine the access control configuration for group conversations. Check if the server enforces membership validation before returning conversation content. Look for Authorization header handling and session validation in the web service logs or proxy configuration.Affected if No membership verification is enforced when accessing conversation endpoints; any authenticated user can query conversation IDs
-
Test cross-group conversation enumerationUsing an API client or browser, attempt to access a group conversation endpoint (such as /api/conversations/{conversationId}/messages) with a conversation ID from a group you are not a member of, while authenticated as a regular user.Affected if The server returns conversation content or message history for groups the authenticated user does not belong to
-
Review server logs for unauthorized access patternsInspect Sametime server access logs or audit logs for repeated requests to conversation endpoints from users accessing conversation IDs outside their membership scope. Look for patterns indicating enumeration or bulk access.Affected if Logs show access to conversation resources by users not listed as group members
If the installed Sametime version is exactly 11.6 AND group messaging is enabled, the environment is affected by this vulnerability if unauthorized users can retrieve conversation content from groups they do not belong to.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper authorization checks to verify user membership before allowing access to group conversation contents, and audit all conversation access patterns for similar vulnerabilities.
Contact HCL support for the fixed release version
- Contact HCL technical support (support.hcltechsw.com) to obtain the specific patch or fixed release for this vulnerability
- Request CVE-2021-27772 remediation details and any available security patches
- Apply the vendor-provided security update to Sametime 11.6
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-27772 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-27772 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data