CVE-2021-27878
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Veritas Backup Exec before 21.2. The communication between a client and an Agent requires successful authentication, which is typically completed over a secure TLS communication. However, due to a vulnerability in the SHA Authentication scheme, an attacker is able to gain unauthorized access and complete the authentication process. Subsequently, the client can execute data management protocol commands on the authenticated connection. The attacker could use one of these commands to execute an arbitrary command on the system using system privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVeritas Backup Exec before version 21.2 contains a flaw in the SHA Authentication scheme used for client-to-Agent communication. An attacker can bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access, then execute data management protocol commands that allow arbitrary command execution with SYSTEM privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Backup Exec versionOpen Backup Exec console, go to Help > About, or check the installed programs list in Windows Control Panel. Note the exact version number displayed.Affected if Version is earlier than 21.2 (e.g., 21.0, 20.x, older releases)
-
Confirm Backup Exec Agent is installedCheck Windows Services for 'Backup Exec Agent' service, or look for Agent installation in Program Files/Veritas/Backup Exec/Agents.Affected if Agent component is installed on the system
-
Verify Agent network listening statusRun command 'netstat -an | findstr LISTENING' and look for ports associated with Backup Exec Agent (typically 10000, 6103, or configurable agent ports). Check if these ports are bound to external interfaces.Affected if Agent ports are listening on external/network interfaces (not localhost only)
-
Check SHA Authentication configurationIn Backup Exec console, navigate to Agent properties or authentication settings. Look for SHA-based authentication method configuration for agent communication.Affected if SHA Authentication scheme is enabled for agent communications
-
Review network access controlsExamine firewall rules or network segmentation affecting Backup Exec Agent ports. Check if unrestricted access is allowed from untrusted network segments.Affected if Agent is accessible from network addresses outside trusted management infrastructure
System is affected if Backup Exec version is below 21.2 AND the Agent component is network-accessible with SHA Authentication enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Upgrade Veritas Backup Exec to version 21.2 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
Backup Exec 21.2 or later
- 1. Review Veritas Backup Exec 21.2 release notes and upgrade documentation for pre-upgrade requirements
- 2. Create a full backup of the Backup Exec configuration and database
- 3. Download Backup Exec 21.2 or later from Veritas Support website (www.veritas.com/support)
- 4. Apply the upgrade following Veritas installation documentation
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version in Backup Exec administration console
- 6. Test critical backup and restore operations to ensure functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-27878 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-27878 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data