CVE-2021-28136
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Bluetooth Classic implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 4.4 and earlier does not properly handle the reception of multiple LMP IO Capability Request packets during the pairing process, allowing attackers in radio range to trigger memory corruption (and consequently a crash) in ESP32 via a replayed (duplicated) LMP packet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) implementation in ESP-IDF 4.4 and earlier fails to properly handle multiple LMP (Link Management Protocol) IO Capability Request packets during the pairing process. An attacker within radio range can replay or duplicate these LMP packets, triggering memory corruption that causes the ESP32 to crash.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ESP-IDF version used in firmwareCheck your build system, release notes, or firmware metadata for the ESP-IDF version tag or commit hash. Compare it to the affected range: any version 4.4 or earlier.Affected if The ESP-IDF version is 4.4 or earlier.
-
Verify Bluetooth Classic is enabledInspect the project configuration (sdkconfig or defconfig) for CONFIG_BT_BTU_TASK_STACK_SIZE or similar Bluetooth options. Look for CONFIG_BT_BLE_ENABLED or CONFIG_BT_BR_ENABLED settings.Affected if CONFIG_BT_BR_ENABLED or CONFIG_BT_CLASSIC is set to y/true in the build configuration.
-
Confirm device exposes Bluetooth Classic interfaceCheck if the firmware initializes Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) using esp_bt_controller_init with ESP_BT_MODE_CLASSIC_BT or calls like esp_bt_codep_coded_coc_init. Review the application's Bluetooth initialization code.Affected if The firmware code calls esp_bt_controller_init with ESP_BT_MODE_CLASSIC_BT or enables classic Bluetooth via menuconfig.
-
Check if device is in pairing-discoverable modeMonitor Bluetooth traffic or review application logs for HCI commands like HCI_IO_CAPABILITY_REQUEST. Verify the device accepts pairing requests from unknown devices.Affected if The device is discoverable and accepts pairing requests from any nearby attacker.
You are affected if your firmware was built with ESP-IDF 4.4 or earlier and has Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) enabled and exposed to unknown attackers within radio range.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade ESP-IDF to version 4.4.1 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling Bluetooth Classic functionality or implementing network-level controls to prevent unauthorized attackers from reaching devices in radio range.
ESP-IDF 4.4.1 or later (recommended: latest 4.4.x stable release)
- 1. Identify the current ESP-IDF version installed by running 'idf.py --version' or checking the 'IDF_VERSION' environment variable
- 2. Download the latest stable ESP-IDF release (v4.4.6 or later) from the official Espressif GitHub repository: https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/releases
- 3. Back up any existing projects and custom board configurations
- 4. Install the new ESP-IDF version following the standard installation process for your operating system (Windows, Linux, or macOS)
- 5. Update the 'IDF_PATH' environment variable to point to the new installation directory
- 6. Run 'idf.py fullclean' on existing projects to remove cached build files
- 7. Rebuild and flash the application to the ESP32 device using 'idf.py build' and 'idf.py -p /dev/ttyUSB0 flash monitor'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-28136 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-28136 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data