CVE-2021-28139
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Bluetooth Classic implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 4.4 and earlier does not properly restrict the Feature Page upon reception of an LMP Feature Response Extended packet, allowing attackers in radio range to trigger arbitrary code execution in ESP32 via a crafted Extended Features bitfield payload.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe ESP-IDF Bluetooth Classic stack fails to properly validate the Feature Page in LMP Feature Response Extended packets. When an ESP32 receives a crafted Extended Features bitfield payload from a nearby attacker, the malformed input can be processed in an unsafe manner, leading to arbitrary code execution on the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ESP-IDF is the firmware frameworkCheck your build system, firmware documentation, or examine the firmware image for ESP-IDF markers. Look for the ESP-IDF version string in the firmware binary or check your project's IDF_PATH or version.h headers.Affected if The device does not use ESP-IDF as its framework, then this CVE does not apply.
-
Identify the installed ESP-IDF versionRun 'git log' in your ESP-IDF directory, check the version tag in the IDF environment (idf.py --version), or look for version indicators in your firmware build artifacts. Compare the version to the affected range: any version <= 4.4 is affected.Affected if The ESP-IDF version is 4.4 or lower.
-
Verify Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) is enabledCheck your project configuration (sdkconfig or menuconfig) for CONFIG_BT_BLUEDROID_ENABLED=y and verify that Bluetooth Classic support is not disabled. Look for CONFIG_BT_CLASSIC_ENABLED or similar Bluetooth Classic configuration options.Affected if Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) is enabled in the firmware configuration.
-
Confirm the device uses the legacy LMP Feature Response Extended handlerReview the ESP-IDF Bluetooth stack source code in your firmware or IDF installation. The vulnerability exists in the LMP feature response extended packet handler within the classic Bluetooth stack. Check if your build includes the Bluetooth controller and stack components.Affected if The firmware includes the ESP-IDF Bluetooth Classic stack handling LMP packets.
A device is affected if it runs ESP-IDF version 4.4 or lower with Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) enabled, as the vulnerability resides in the LMP Feature Response Extended packet processing path.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate ESP-IDF to a version newer than 4.4 that contains the proper bounds checking on Feature Page values in LMP Feature Response Extended packets, then rebuild and deploy updated firmware to all affected ESP32 devices.
ESP-IDF v4.4.1 or later stable release
- 1. Identify the current ESP-IDF version in use by checking with 'idf.py --version' or reviewing project configuration
- 2. Download the latest stable ESP-IDF release from the official Espressif repository at https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf
- 3. Install the updated ESP-IDF version following the standard installation process for your operating system
- 4. Update the ESP-IDF environment by running the install script (install.sh or install.bat) and activating the environment (export.sh or export.bat)
- 5. Clean and rebuild existing projects to ensure the new ESP-IDF components are used
- 6. Rebuild and redeploy firmware to ESP32 devices
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-28139 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-28139 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data