CVE-2021-28495
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Arista's MOS (Metamako Operating System) software which is supported on the 7130 product line, under certain conditions, user authentication can be bypassed when API access is enabled via the JSON-RPC APIs. This issue affects: Arista Metamako Operating System All releases in the MOS-0.1x train MOS-0.13 and post releases in the MOS-0.1x train MOS-0.26.6 and below releases in the MOS-0.2x train MOS-0.31.1 and below releases in the MOS-0.3x train
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceArista MOS (Metamako Operating System) on the 7130 product line contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the JSON-RPC API. When API access is enabled, certain conditions allow attackers to bypass user authentication entirely, gaining unauthorized access to the system without valid credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 0.10.0, <= 0.13.0>= 0.20.0, <= 0.26.7>= 0.30.0, < 0.32.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm you are running Arista MOS on a 7130 series deviceCheck the device model and product type via 'show version' or similar command that displays hardware model informationAffected if Device is not an Arista 7130 series running MOS
-
Identify the installed MOS versionRun the command to display the MOS version (typically 'show version' or 'show system information') and note the firmware version numberAffected if Version falls within these ranges: 0.10.0 to 0.13.0, 0.20.0 to 0.26.7, or 0.30.0 to below 0.32.0
-
Determine if the JSON-RPC API is enabledExamine the device configuration for API or JSON-RPC settings, typically via 'show running-config' or a dedicated API configuration commandAffected if API access is enabled in the device configuration
-
Check network exposure of the JSON-RPC APIReview interface configurations and ACL policies to determine if the API service port is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The API is reachable from network segments outside the trusted administrative network
You are affected if you have an Arista 7130 device running MOS versions 0.10.0-0.13.0, 0.20.0-0.26.7, or 0.30.0-0.31.x with the JSON-RPC API enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.32.0
Upgrade to a patched MOS version beyond the vulnerable releases (MOS-0.26.6, MOS-0.31.1, or MOS-0.3x train). As an interim compensating control, restrict access to the JSON-RPC API via network ACLs or disable API access if not required.
MOS-0.14.0+ for 0.1x train; MOS-0.26.8+ for 0.2x train; MOS-0.32.0+ for 0.3x train
- 1. Identify the current MOS version by running 'show version' or checking the system management interface
- 2. Determine which MOS train (0.1x, 0.2x, or 0.3x) the current version belongs to
- 3. For MOS-0.1x train (versions 0.10.0-0.13.0): Upgrade to MOS-0.14.0 or later
- 4. For MOS-0.2x train (versions 0.20.0-0.26.7): Upgrade to MOS-0.26.8 or later
- 5. For MOS-0.3x train (versions 0.30.0-0.31.1): Upgrade to MOS-0.32.0 or later
- 6. Download the appropriate upgrade image from Arista's support portal (www.arista.com)
- 7. Follow standard Arista upgrade procedures: upload the image, verify integrity, reboot to apply
- 8. After upgrade, verify the fix by confirming the version and testing API authentication
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-28495 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-28495 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data