CVE-2021-28695
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIOMMU page mapping issues on x86 T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Both AMD and Intel allow ACPI tables to specify regions of memory which should be left untranslated, which typically means these addresses should pass the translation phase unaltered. While these are typically device specific ACPI properties, they can also be specified to apply to a range of devices, or even all devices. On all systems with such regions Xen failed to prevent guests from undoing/replacing such mappings (CVE-2021-28694). On AMD systems, where a discontinuous range is specified by firmware, the supposedly-excluded middle range will also be identity-mapped (CVE-2021-28695). Further, on AMD systems, upon de-assigment of a physical device from a guest, the identity mappings would be left in place, allowing a guest continued access to ranges of memory which it shouldn't have access to anymore (CVE-2021-28696).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA flaw in the Xen hypervisor's IOMMU page mapping on AMD systems causes identity-mapped memory ranges to incorrectly include the excluded middle portions of discontinuous ranges specified by firmware ACPI tables. When firmware defines a discontinuous (gapped) range to be identity-mapped, the middle gap that should be excluded instead gets identity-mapped, potentially allowing unauthorized memory access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 33= 34= 35= 10.0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Xen hypervisor is runningRun 'xl list' or 'xm list' to list running domains, or check for xen kernel with 'uname -a' or check for xen daemon with 'ps aux | grep xen'Affected if Xen hypervisor is not present - not affected. If Xen is running, continue to next checks.
-
Verify AMD hardware platformCheck CPU vendor with 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' and look for 'AuthenticAMD' in the vendor field, or use 'lscpu | grep Vendor'Affected if System uses AMD processors - potentially affected. Intel systems are not affected by this specific flaw.
-
Confirm IOMMU is enabledCheck Xen logs with 'xl dmesg | grep -i iommu' or inspect /boot/config-* for CONFIG_XEN_AMD_PIN_CONTROL and check for AMD-Vi or IOMMU in dmesgAffected if IOMMU is enabled and active - the flaw can be triggered. If IOMMU is disabled, the attack surface is reduced.
-
Check Xen versionRun 'xl version' or 'xm version' to get the Xen hypervisor version, or check installed package with 'rpm -q xen' (Fedora) or 'dpkg -l xen' (Debian)Affected if Any version of Xen on AMD systems with IOMMU enabled is potentially affected. Compare against any available patched versions from your distribution.
-
Review ACPI tables for discontinuous rangesUse 'acpidump' or check /sys/firmware/acpi/tables for IVRS (IOMMU) table presence, and review any custom ACPI tables defining memory ranges for device assignmentAffected if ACPI tables define discontinuous (gapped) memory ranges for IOMMU mapping - these are the specific conditions where the flaw manifests.
A system is affected if it runs Xen on AMD hardware with IOMMU enabled and uses ACPI tables that define discontinuous memory ranges for device assignment; the vulnerability allows unauthorized access to the gap portions of these ranges.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Xen security patch for CVE-2021-28695. Review and reconfigure IOMMU mappings to ensure discontinuous ranges are properly handled, and verify that guest-assigned devices cannot access unintended memory ranges.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,736.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-28695 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-28695 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data