CVE-2021-28710
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedcertain VT-d IOMMUs may not work in shared page table mode For efficiency reasons, address translation control structures (page tables) may (and, on suitable hardware, by default will) be shared between CPUs, for second-level translation (EPT), and IOMMUs. These page tables are presently set up to always be 4 levels deep. However, an IOMMU may require the use of just 3 page table levels. In such a configuration the lop level table needs to be stripped before inserting the root table's address into the hardware pagetable base register. When sharing page tables, Xen erroneously skipped this stripping. Consequently, the guest is able to write to leaf page table entries.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Xen hypervisors with VT-d IOMMU support, when sharing page tables between CPUs and IOMMUs, the top-level page table is incorrectly not stripped for configurations requiring only 3 levels instead of 4. This allows a guest VM to write to leaf page table entries, potentially enabling privilege escalation from guest to hypervisor.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 35= 4.15.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Xen hypervisor installationRun 'xl info' or 'xm info' to confirm Xen is running, or check for xen-related processes with 'ps aux | grep xen'Affected if Xen hypervisor is not present - the CVE only affects Xen environments with VT-d IOMMU support
-
Check Xen versionRun 'xl info' or 'xm info' and look for the 'xen_version' field, or check 'rpm -q xen' on Fedora systemsAffected if Version equals 4.15.0 or matches the affected range (exact version 4.15.0 and Fedora 35)
-
Verify VT-d IOMMU is enabledRun 'xl dmesg | grep -i vt-d' or check for 'iommu=1' in Xen boot parameters via 'cat /proc/cmdline'Affected if VT-d IOMMU is enabled - the flaw requires VT-d IOMMU support to be active
-
Check for shared page table configurationExamine Xen configuration files (e.g., /etc/xen/xl.conf or /etc/xen/config) for 'iommu_map' or 'hvm_iommu' settings, or check 'xl dmesg' for shared page table related messagesAffected if Shared page table mode between CPUs and IOMMU is enabled - the vulnerability requires this sharing configuration
You are affected if you are running Xen 4.15.0 (or Fedora 35 with Xen) with VT-d IOMMU support enabled and shared page table mode configured between CPUs and the IOMMU.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Xen security patch for CVE-2021-28710. If patching is not immediately possible, consider disabling shared page table mode (if supported by hardware and acceptable for performance) as a temporary workaround.
Xen 4.15.1 or later (or updated distribution-provided Xen package)
- 1. Back up all virtual machine configurations and data before updating the hypervisor
- 2. For Fedora 35 systems: Run 'dnf update' to install the latest Xen packages which include the security fix
- 3. For Gentoo systems: Run 'emerge --sync' followed by 'emerge --update xen' to get patched Xen packages
- 4. After updating, verify the Xen version matches a fixed release (4.15.1 or later) using 'xl info' or 'xm info'
- 5. Reboot the host system to load the updated hypervisor
- 6. Verify that virtual machines start correctly and the hypervisor is running the fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-28710 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-28710 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data