CVE-2021-28797
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS devices running Surveillance Station. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code. QNAP have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: Surveillance Station 5.1.5.4.3 (and later) for ARM CPU NAS (64bit OS) and x86 CPU NAS (64bit OS) Surveillance Station 5.1.5.3.3 (and later) for ARM CPU NAS (32bit OS) and x86 CPU NAS (32bit OS)
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in QNAP Surveillance Station allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code due to improper bounds checking in the surveillance application. This critical memory corruption flaw can be exploited over the network without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.1.5.3.3>= 5.1.5.4.0, < 5.1.5.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm QNAP Surveillance Station is installedAccess the QNAP NAS admin interface, go to App Center or Surveillance Station, and verify the application is present and running.Affected if Surveillance Station is installed and running on the QNAP device
-
Identify NAS architecture (32-bit or 64-bit)In QNAP admin interface, check System Settings > Hardware, or run command 'uname -m' via SSH to determine if the NAS is 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x86_64/aarch64).Affected if The NAS architecture cannot be determined or is not recognized as either 32-bit or 64-bit
-
Find installed Surveillance Station versionIn Surveillance Station, go to Settings > System > About, or access the QNAP App Center and check the version displayed for Surveillance Station.Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is not visible in the UI or App Center
-
Compare version against affected rangesFor 32-bit NAS: version must be >= 5.1.5.3.3 to be unaffected. For 64-bit NAS: version must be >= 5.1.5.4.3 to be unaffected. Any version below these thresholds is affected.Affected if Version is below 5.1.5.3.3 on 32-bit systems, OR version is >= 5.1.5.4.0 but below 5.1.5.4.3 on 64-bit systems
The environment is affected if QNAP Surveillance Station is installed and the installed version falls below 5.1.5.3.3 for 32-bit NAS or between 5.1.5.4.0 and 5.1.5.4.3 for 64-bit NAS.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.1.5.3.35.1.5.4.3
Update Surveillance Station to version 5.1.5.4.3 or later for 64-bit NAS systems, or version 5.1.5.3.3 or later for 32-bit NAS systems. Verify camera integrations and recording functionality after updating.
Surveillance Station 5.1.5.4.3+ for ARM64/x86-64; Surveillance Station 5.1.5.3.3+ for ARM32/x86-32
- 1. Identify your QNAP NAS CPU architecture (ARM 32-bit, ARM 64-bit, x86 32-bit, or x86 64-bit) - check QNAP product specifications or QTS System Information
- 2. Check current Surveillance Station version in QTS under App Center > Installed
- 3. For ARM64 or x86-64 CPU NAS devices: Upgrade Surveillance Station to version 5.1.5.4.3 or later
- 4. For ARM32 or x86-32 CPU NAS devices: Upgrade Surveillance Station to version 5.1.5.3.3 or later
- 5. After upgrade, verify the installed version in App Center matches the target fixed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-28797 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-28797 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data