EnvoyApplication · Envoyproxy

CVE-2021-29492

HIGH · 8.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-05-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.15.5 / 1.16.4 or later.
See remediation →
92/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
High EPSS Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Envoy is a cloud-native edge/middle/service proxy. Envoy does not decode escaped slash sequences `%2F` and `%5C` in HTTP URL paths in versions 1.18.2 and before. A remote attacker may craft a path with escaped slashes, e.g. `/something%2F..%2Fadmin`, to bypass access control, e.g. a block on `/admin`. A backend server could then decode slash sequences and normalize path and provide an attacker access beyond the scope provided for by the access control policy. ### Impact Escalation of Privileges when using RBAC or JWT filters with enforcement based on URL path. Users with back end servers that interpret `%2F` and `/` and `%5C` and `\` interchangeably are impacted. ### Attack Vector URL paths containing escaped slash characters delivered by untrusted client. Patches in versions 1.18.3, 1.17.3, 1.16.4, 1.15.5 contain new path normalization option to decode escaped slash characters. As a workaround, if back end servers treat `%2F` and `/` and `%5C` and `\` interchangeably and a URL path based access control is configured, one may reconfigure the back end server to not treat `%2F` and `/` and `%5C` and `\` interchangeably.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Envoy proxy versions 1.18.2 and before fail to decode escaped slash sequences (%2F for / and %5C for \) in HTTP URL paths before applying access control policies, allowing attackers to bypass RBAC or JWT path-based restrictions using crafted URLs like /something%2F..%2Fadmin.

MitigationUpgrade to Envoy versions 1.18.3, 1.17.3, 1.16.4, or 1.15.5 which contain the new path normalization option to decode escaped slash characters, or ensure backend servers do not treat %2F and / interchangeably.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EnvoyApplication
Affected:< 1.15.5>= 1.16.0, < 1.16.4>= 1.17.0, < 1.17.3>= 1.18.0, < 1.18.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine Envoy proxy version
    Run 'envoy --version' or check the Docker image tag, or look for the version in the Envoy binary metadata
    Affected if The version is < 1.15.5, >= 1.16.0 and < 1.16.4, >= 1.17.0 and < 1.17.3, or >= 1.18.0 and < 1.18.3
  2. Identify if RBAC filter is configured
    Inspect your Envoy configuration (static or dynamic) for 'envoy.filters.http.rbac' in the HTTP filter chain
    Affected if RBAC filter is present and uses path-based rules to grant or deny access
  3. Identify if JWT authentication is configured
    Inspect your Envoy configuration for 'envoy.filters.http.jwt_authn' and check if any rule specifies path requirements
    Affected if JWT verification is enabled with path-based authorization rules
  4. Check for path normalization configuration
    Look for 'normalize_path: true' or 'merge_slashes: true' in the route configuration or listener settings
    Affected if Path normalization is not enabled or explicitly disabled (vulnerable configurations do not decode %2F before policy evaluation)

You are affected if you run a vulnerable Envoy version AND have RBAC or JWT path-based access policies configured without proper path normalization enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.15.5 / 1.16.4 / 1.17.3 or later
Fixed in 1.15.51.16.41.17.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Envoy versions 1.18.3, 1.17.3, 1.16.4, or 1.15.5 which contain the new path normalization option to decode escaped slash characters, or ensure backend servers do not treat %2F and / interchangeably.

Fix this in Envoy Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-29492 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-29492 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data