CVE-2021-29653
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise 1.5.1 and newer, under certain circumstances, may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the CRL. Fixed in 1.5.8, 1.6.4, and 1.7.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHashiCorp Vault's PKI secrets engine versions 1.5.1+ may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) under certain circumstances. This allows previously-revoked certificates to appear valid to verifying parties, potentially enabling continued unauthorized access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.5.1, < 1.5.8>= 1.6.0, < 1.6.4>= 1.7.0, < 1.7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Vault versionRun 'vault version' or check the Vault binary version to identify the exact releaseAffected if The version is >= 1.5.1 and < 1.5.8, OR >= 1.6.0 and < 1.6.4, OR >= 1.7.0 and < 1.7.1
-
Identify enabled secrets enginesRun 'vault secrets list' to enumerate enabled secrets engines and look for 'pki' or 'pki_int' type enginesAffected if A PKI secrets engine is enabled with a version from the affected range above
-
Check PKI mount configurationRun 'vault read sys/mounts/<pki_mount_point>' to inspect the PKI engine configurationAffected if The PKI mount exists and uses a Vault version in the affected range
-
Inspect CRL generation settingsReview the PKI role configuration using 'vault read <pki_mount_point>/roles/<role_name>' and check for any delta CRL or excluded_revoked attributesAffected if Custom CRL settings exist that may exclude revoked but unexpired certificates from the generated CRL
You are affected if your Vault version falls within the ranges >= 1.5.1 < 1.5.8, >= 1.6.0 < 1.6.4, or >= 1.7.0 < 1.7.1 AND you have a PKI secrets engine enabled with CRL generation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data1.5.81.6.41.7.1
Upgrade Vault to version 1.5.8, 1.6.4, 1.7.1 or later; then regenerate CRLs to ensure all revoked certificates are properly listed.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-29653 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-29653 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data