Security Identity ManagerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2021-29683

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-05-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Security Identity Manager 7.0.2 stores user credentials in plain clear text which can be read by an authenticated user. IBM X-Force ID: 199998.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Security Identity Manager 7.0.2 stores user credentials in plaintext (unencrypted) within its data storage. An authenticated user with standard application access can read these plaintext credentials, leading to credential disclosure and potential account compromise.

MitigationImplement encryption for stored credentials using strong encryption (AES-256) with proper key management. If a patched version is available from IBM, apply the update. Audit access controls and rotate any compromised credentials.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Security Identity ManagerApplication
Affected:= 7.0.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM Security Identity Manager version
    Check the installed version of IBM Security Identity Manager using the product's administration console, command line tools, or version information files. Compare against 7.0.2.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 7.0.2.
  2. Locate credential data storage
    Identify where IBM Security Identity Manager stores user credentials. This is typically a database (such as IBM DB2, Oracle, or Microsoft SQL Server) configured during installation. Consult the product documentation or configuration files for the data source connection details.
    Affected if The product uses its built-in data storage for user credentials.
  3. Inspect credential storage format
    Access the credential storage (database) using appropriate credentials and query the user or credential tables. Examine the password or credential fields to determine if they appear in plaintext or encrypted form. Encrypted credentials should display as hashed or ciphered strings; plaintext credentials will appear as readable text.
    Affected if User credentials are stored in plaintext (readable, unencrypted format) in the data storage.
  4. Verify encryption configuration
    Check IBM Security Identity Manager configuration files (such as enRole.properties or related XML configuration files) and the Java keystore for encryption settings. Look for encryption algorithm configurations (such as AES-256) and key management settings.
    Affected if No encryption is configured for credential storage, or encryption is explicitly disabled.

A user is affected if IBM Security Identity Manager version 7.0.2 is installed and user credentials are stored in plaintext (unencrypted) in the data storage, allowing any authenticated user with standard access to read them.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement encryption for stored credentials using strong encryption (AES-256) with proper key management. If a patched version is available from IBM, apply the update. Audit access controls and rotate any compromised credentials.

Fix this in Security Identity Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-29683 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-29683 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data