Resilient Security Orchestration Automation And ResponseApplication · Ibm

CVE-2021-29704

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-08-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 42.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Security SOAR uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Security SOAR implements weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms (likely weak ciphers or hashing), which could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information stored or transmitted by the system.

MitigationReplace weak cryptographic algorithms with industry-standard strong algorithms (e.g., AES-256, SHA-256+) and re-encrypt any affected sensitive data.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Resilient Security Orchestration Automation And ResponseApplication
Affected:< 42.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check IBM SOAR installed version
    Query the system for the current IBM Security SOAR version using the platform's built-in version command or check the about/status page in the web interface
    Affected if The installed version is any release prior to 42.0 (for example, 41.x, 40.x, etc.)
  2. Identify cryptographic configuration settings
    Locate and review configuration files related to encryption, hashing, or cipher settings in the IBM SOAR installation directory
    Affected if Weak cryptographic algorithms (such as outdated ciphers or weak hashing) are configured and the version is below 42.0
  3. Inspect data-at-rest encryption settings
    Examine the encryption configuration used for stored sensitive data in the SOAR database or file storage
    Affected if The system uses legacy or weak encryption algorithms for data-at-rest and the version is below 42.0

If the installed IBM SOAR version is below 42.0, the environment is affected by this vulnerability because it implements weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 42.0 or later
Fixed in 42.0
Interim mitigation

Replace weak cryptographic algorithms with industry-standard strong algorithms (e.g., AES-256, SHA-256+) and re-encrypt any affected sensitive data.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

42.0

  1. Download IBM Security SOAR version 42.0 or later from IBM Fix Central or the IBM Passport Advantage site
  2. Review IBM SOAR upgrade documentation and release notes for version 42.0
  3. Ensure you have a complete backup of the current IBM SOAR environment
  4. Follow IBM's standard upgrade procedure for SOAR platform (stop services, run upgrade installer, verify installation, restart services)
  5. After upgrade, verify that stronger cryptographic algorithms are in use and confirm the vulnerability is resolved
Caveat Review release notes for any configuration or integration changes between your current version and 42.0

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Resilient Security Orchestration Automation And Response Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
50.0 hours of engineering $8,800
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,080.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-29704 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-29704 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data