Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On PremisesApplication · Ibm

CVE-2021-29790

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-07-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-Premises (All versions) is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 203440.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-Premises contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in its web UI. Attackers can embed malicious JavaScript code into the application interface, which executes in the browsers of other users viewing the compromised content. This can lead to session hijacking and credentials disclosure within trusted sessions.

MitigationApply vendor-provided patches for this vulnerability. Implement output encoding and input validation on all user-supplied data in the web interface. Consider deploying Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to reduce XSS impact.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On PremisesApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm IBM Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant is installed
    Check for the application in your system inventory or running services. Look for processes or services associated with IBM Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant.
    Affected if The product is installed and running in your environment.
  2. Verify web UI accessibility
    Access the application's web interface through a browser. Note the URL and port used for the application.
    Affected if The web UI is accessible over the network.
  3. Identify user input points in the web interface
    Navigate through the application and locate fields that accept user-supplied data such as requirements entries, comments, descriptions, or search fields.
    Affected if The application contains user input fields where data is stored and displayed back to users.
  4. Inspect for absence of output encoding
    Enter a basic HTML or script tag such as <script>alert(1)</script> into an input field and save. Then view the saved content to see if the tag renders as plain text or executes.
    Affected if The entered script tags render as actual HTML or execute as JavaScript instead of being escaped.
  5. Check for Content Security Policy headers
    Use browser developer tools or a command-line tool like curl to inspect the HTTP response headers from the application for the presence of Content-Security-Policy header.
    Affected if No Content-Security-Policy header is present, or it allows inline scripts.

You are affected if IBM Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On-Premises is installed and its web interface accepts user input that is not properly sanitized before being displayed to other users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-provided patches for this vulnerability. Implement output encoding and input validation on all user-supplied data in the web interface. Consider deploying Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to reduce XSS impact.

Fix this in Engineering Requirements Quality Assistant On Premises Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-29790 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-29790 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data