FirefoxWeb browser · Mozilla

CVE-2021-29977

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-08-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 90.0 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Mozilla developers reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 89. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 90.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Memory safety vulnerability in Firefox 89 involving multiple memory corruption bugs. Mozilla developers identified these bugs as showing evidence of memory corruption with the potential for exploitation to achieve arbitrary code execution. Affects Firefox versions prior to 90.

MitigationUpgrade to Firefox 90 or later to remediate the vulnerability. No other mitigation options are described; users should apply the vendor patch promptly.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FirefoxWeb browser
Affected:< 90.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Firefox version via internal page
    Open a new tab and navigate to about:Firefox or go to Help > About Firefox. The version number is displayed on this page.
    Affected if The displayed version is below 90.0 (for example 89.x, 88.x, etc.)
  2. Check Firefox version via command line
    Open a terminal or command prompt and run: firefox --version (Linux/macOS) or "C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe" -v (Windows).
    Affected if The version output shows a number lower than 90.0
  3. Check Firefox version via system package manager
    On Linux systems, query the installed package: dpkg -l firefox (Debian/Ubuntu) or rpm -q firefox (RHEL/Fedora) or pacman -Q firefox (Arch).
    Affected if The listed package version is below 90.0
  4. Check Firefox version on Windows via file properties
    Navigate to C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\ and right-click firefox.exe to view Properties > Details. The File Version is shown there.
    Affected if The file version shown is below 90.0.0

You are affected if any method shows Firefox installed with a version number less than 90.0.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 90.0 or later
Fixed in 90.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Firefox 90 or later to remediate the vulnerability. No other mitigation options are described; users should apply the vendor patch promptly.

Recommended fix High confidence

Firefox 90.0

  1. 1. Back up any important browser data (bookmarks, saved passwords, etc.)
  2. 2. Close all instances of Firefox
  3. 3. Download Firefox 90.0 or later from the official Mozilla website (www.mozilla.org)
  4. 4. Run the installer and follow the prompts to upgrade
  5. 5. Alternatively, use your system's package manager to update Firefox (e.g., apt-get update && apt-get install firefox on Debian/Ubuntu, or dnf update firefox on Fedora)
  6. 6. After installation, verify the version by navigating to about:Firefox in the address bar

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Firefox Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
4.0 hours of engineering $750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-29977 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-29977 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data