CVE-2021-3044
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper authorization vulnerability in Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR enables a remote unauthenticated attacker with network access to the Cortex XSOAR server to perform unauthorized actions through the REST API. This issue impacts: Cortex XSOAR 6.1.0 builds later than 1016923 and earlier than 1271064; Cortex XSOAR 6.2.0 builds earlier than 1271065. This issue does not impact Cortex XSOAR 5.5.0, Cortex XSOAR 6.0.0, Cortex XSOAR 6.0.1, or Cortex XSOAR 6.0.2 versions. All Cortex XSOAR instances hosted by Palo Alto Networks are upgraded to resolve this vulnerability. No additional action is required for these instances.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCortex XSOAR contains an improper authorization vulnerability in its REST API that allows remote unauthenticated attackers with network access to bypass authorization checks and perform unauthorized actions. This critical flaw affects specific builds of versions 6.1.0 and 6.2.0, enabling full compromise of the security orchestration platform through the API.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.1.0= 6.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cortex XSOAR versionAccess the Cortex XSOAR web interface and navigate to Settings > About, or use the /health endpoint of the REST API to retrieve the server version informationAffected if The version displayed is 6.1.0 or 6.2.0 exactly
-
Retrieve the build numberIn the About page or API response, locate the build number (also shown as the revision number). This is a numeric value such as 1271064 or similarAffected if The build number exists and is displayed
-
Compare build against vulnerable range for version 6.1.0If version 6.1.0 is installed, check if the build number is lower than 1271064. The vulnerable builds are those below this thresholdAffected if Version 6.1.0 is installed with a build number lower than 1271064
-
Compare build against vulnerable range for version 6.2.0If version 6.2.0 is installed, check if the build number is lower than 1271065. The vulnerable builds are those below this thresholdAffected if Version 6.2.0 is installed with a build number lower than 1271065
-
Verify REST API accessibilityConfirm that the Cortex XSOAR REST API is exposed to network access (typically on ports 443 or 8080). Check firewall or reverse proxy configuration to determine if unauthenticated network access is possibleAffected if The REST API is externally accessible without authentication
You are affected if your Cortex XSOAR is version 6.1.0 with build lower than 1271064, or version 6.2.0 with build lower than 1271065, and the REST API is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Cortex XSOAR 6.1.0 build 1271064 or later, or 6.2.0 build 1271065 or later. Palo Alto Networks-hosted instances require no action as they are already patched.
Cortex XSOAR 6.1.0 build >=1271064 or 6.2.0 build >=1271065, or upgrade to latest 6.x release (6.3.0+)
- Identify current Cortex XSOAR build version by navigating to Settings > About in the Cortex XSOAR web interface
- For Cortex XSOAR 6.1.0: Upgrade to build 1271064 or later to remediate the vulnerability
- For Cortex XSOAR 6.2.0: Upgrade to build 1271065 or later to remediate the vulnerability
- Alternatively, upgrade to the latest available Cortex XSOAR 6.x release (6.3.0 or later) which contains the security fix
- After upgrade, verify the build number reflects the patched version in Settings > About
- Validate that REST API authentication is functioning correctly with proper authorization checks
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-3044 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-3044 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data