CVE-2021-3053
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper handling of exceptional conditions vulnerability exists in the Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS dataplane that enables an unauthenticated network-based attacker to send specifically crafted traffic through the firewall that causes the service to crash. Repeated attempts to send this request result in denial of service to all PAN-OS services by restarting the device and putting it into maintenance mode. This issue impacts: PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.20; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.14; PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.9; PAN-OS 10.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 10.0.5. This issue does not affect Prisma Access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the PAN-OS dataplane allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to send specially crafted traffic that triggers improper exception handling, causing the firewall service to crash. Repeated exploitation results in sustained denial of service as the device repeatedly restarts and enters maintenance mode.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.20>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.14>= 9.1.0, < 9.1.9>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PAN-OS versionAccess the firewall management interface or use the command: show system info or request system info. Look for the 'sw-version' or 'PAN-OS' field showing the exact version number.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 8.1.0 to 8.1.19, 9.0.0 to 9.0.13, 9.1.0 to 9.1.8, or 10.0.0 to 10.0.4.
-
Check for recent system restartsReview system logs using: request log system dump or check the System Logs for 'system restart' or 'maintenance mode' entries occurring without scheduled maintenance.Affected if The device shows unexpected reboots or entries into maintenance mode that were not planned.
-
Verify firewall service statusAccess the management interface and check the Dashboard or use: show high-availability state to confirm all firewall services are running normally without unexpected down states.Affected if Firewall services show as down, crashed, or the dataplane indicates abnormal status.
-
Review dataplane crash logsUse the command: debug logdump to search for exception handling errors or crash signatures related to specially crafted traffic processing.Affected if Logs show repeated crash events related to exception handling failures in the dataplane.
You are affected if your PAN-OS version is 8.1.0-8.1.19, 9.0.0-9.0.13, 9.1.0-9.1.8, or 10.0.0-10.0.4 AND you observe unexplained service crashes, restarts, or maintenance mode entries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.1.209.0.149.1.9
Upgrade PAN-OS to version 8.1.20, 9.0.14, 9.1.9, 10.0.5 or later. Apply the update during a planned maintenance window and verify firewall services resume normally post-upgrade.
Upgrade to PAN-OS 8.1.20 (or later 8.1.x), 9.0.14 (or later 9.0.x), 9.1.9 (or later 9.1.x), or 10.0.5 (or later 10.0.x) based on your current branch
- 1. Identify the current PAN-OS version by navigating to Device > Setup > Operations or using 'show system info' in the CLI.
- 2. Determine which upgrade path applies based on current version: 8.1.x → 8.1.20+, 9.0.x → 9.0.14+, 9.1.x → 9.1.9+, or 10.0.x → 10.0.5+.
- 3. Download the appropriate PAN-OS upgrade image from the Palo Alto Networks Customer Support Portal (https://support.paloaltonetworks.com).
- 4. Upload the upgrade file via Panorama (if managed) or directly to the firewall via Device > Software or SCP/SFTP.
- 5. Before upgrading, back up the current configuration via Device > Setup > Operations > Save Named Configuration Snapshot.
- 6. Initiate the upgrade: Device > Software > Install (or 'request system software install' in CLI).
- 7. After installation completes, verify the new version via 'show system info' and confirm all services are running normally.
- 8. Validate that the firewall is no longer vulnerable by confirming the installed version meets or exceeds the fixed release for your branch.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,440.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-3053 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-3053 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data