CVE-2021-3059
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn OS command injection vulnerability in the Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS management interface exists when performing dynamic updates. This vulnerability enables a man-in-the-middle attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands to escalate privileges. This issue impacts: PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.20-h1; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.14-h3; PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.11-h2; PAN-OS 10.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 10.0.8; PAN-OS 10.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 10.1.3. Prisma Access customers that have Prisma Access 2.1 Preferred or Prisma Access 2.1 Innovation firewalls are impacted by this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn OS command injection vulnerability exists in the PAN-OS management interface when performing dynamic updates. A man-in-the-middle attacker can inject and execute arbitrary OS commands with elevated privileges by intercepting the update process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.1.0, <= 8.1.20>= 9.0.0, <= 9.0.14>= 9.1.0, <= 9.1.11>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.8>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify PAN-OS versionRun 'show system info' or check the device dashboard to obtain the installed PAN-OS versionAffected if The installed version falls within 8.1.0-8.1.20, 9.0.0-9.0.14, 9.1.0-9.1.11, 10.0.0-10.0.7, or 10.1.0-10.1.2
-
Confirm management interface exposureReview network access controls and determine if the PAN-OS management interface (HTTPS on port 443) is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The management interface is reachable from networks where a man-in-the-middle attacker could intercept traffic
-
Check dynamic update configurationNavigate to Device > Dynamic Updates in the PAN-OS web interface and inspect whether dynamic updates are scheduled or configuredAffected if Dynamic updates are enabled and the device is configured to fetch updates from the internet
The environment is affected if the PAN-OS version is within the listed vulnerable ranges AND the management interface is accessible to an attacker who could intercept dynamic update traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.810.1.3
Upgrade PAN-OS to the fixed versions (8.1.20-h1, 9.0.14-h3, 9.1.11-h2, 10.0.8, 10.1.3 or later). For Prisma Access, migrate to a non-affected version.
PAN-OS 8.1.20-h1 or later (8.1.x); PAN-OS 9.0.14-h3 or later (9.0.x); PAN-OS 9.1.11-h2 or later (9.1.x); PAN-OS 10.0.8 or later (10.0.x); PAN-OS 10.1.3 or later (10.1.x)
- Identify the current PAN-OS version by navigating to Device > About > General in the web interface or running 'show system info' in the CLI
- Determine which upgrade path applies based on your current version (8.1.x, 9.0.x, 9.1.x, or 10.0.x)
- Review the Palo Alto Networks Upgrade Guide for your platform to ensure compatibility and prerequisites
- Create a backup of the current configuration via Device > Setup > Operations > Save named configuration snapshot
- Download the appropriate patched version from the Palo Alto Networks Customer Support Portal: PAN-OS 8.1.20-h1 or later, PAN-OS 9.0.14-h3 or later, PAN-OS 9.1.11-h2 or later, PAN-OS 10.0.8 or later, or PAN-OS 10.1.3 or later
- Upload the upgrade file via Device > Software > Upload, or transfer via SCP/SFTP to the firewall
- Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require a brief downtime
- Install the upgrade via Device > Software > Install and select the uploaded file
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-3059 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-3059 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data