CVE-2021-3060
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn OS command injection vulnerability in the Simple Certificate Enrollment Protocol (SCEP) feature of PAN-OS software allows an unauthenticated network-based attacker with specific knowledge of the firewall configuration to execute arbitrary code with root user privileges. The attacker must have network access to the GlobalProtect interfaces to exploit this issue. This issue impacts: PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.20-h1; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.14-h3; PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.11-h2; PAN-OS 10.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 10.0.8; PAN-OS 10.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 10.1.3. Prisma Access customers with Prisma Access 2.1 Preferred and Prisma Access 2.1 Innovation firewalls are impacted by this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn OS command injection vulnerability in the Simple Certificate Enrollment Protocol (SCEP) feature of PAN-OS allows unauthenticated attackers with network access to GlobalProtect interfaces and knowledge of the firewall configuration to execute arbitrary code with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1>= 8.1.0, <= 8.1.20>= 9.0.0, <= 9.0.14>= 9.1.0, <= 9.1.11>= 10.0.0, < 10.0.8>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PAN-OS or Prisma Access versionLog into the firewall management interface or use CLI command 'show system info' to retrieve the installed software versionAffected if the version falls within any of these ranges: PAN-OS 8.1.0-8.1.20, 9.0.0-9.0.14, 9.1.0-9.1.11, 10.0.0-10.0.7, 10.1.0-10.1.2, or Prisma Access 2.1
-
Confirm GlobalProtect interface is accessibleVerify that the GlobalProtect portal or gateway is exposed to the network and accessible from untrusted networksAffected if GlobalProtect is reachable from external networks without additional authentication barriers
-
Verify SCEP feature is configuredCheck the firewall configuration for SCEP certificate enrollment settings, typically found under Device > Certificate Management > SCEP or via CLI 'show deviceconfig setting scep'Affected if SCEP is enabled or configured on the firewall
The environment is affected if the PAN-OS version is within the vulnerable ranges AND GlobalProtect is network-accessible AND SCEP is configured on the device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.810.1.3
Upgrade PAN-OS to versions 8.1.20-h1, 9.0.14-h3, 9.1.11-h2, 10.0.8, or 10.1.3 and later. For Prisma Access, upgrade to versions beyond 2.1 Innovation/Preferred.
PAN-OS 8.1.20-h1 / 9.0.14-h3 / 9.1.11-h2 / 10.0.8 / 10.1.3 (or later) - Prisma Access contact vendor for update
- 1. Identify the current PAN-OS or Prisma Access version by navigating to Device > Support in the web interface or using 'show system info' in the CLI.
- 2. Determine which upgrade path applies based on your current version: For PAN-OS 8.1.x, upgrade to PAN-OS 8.1.20-h1 or later; For PAN-OS 9.0.x, upgrade to PAN-OS 9.0.14-h3 or later; For PAN-OS 9.1.x, upgrade to PAN-OS 9.1.11-h2 or later; For PAN-OS 10.0.x, upgrade to PAN-OS 10.0.8 or later; For PAN-OS 10.1.x, upgrade to PAN-OS 10.1.3 or later.
- 3. Download the appropriate PAN-OS update from the Palo Alto Networks Customer Support Portal.
- 4. Before upgrading, backup the device configuration via Device > Setup > Operations > Save Named Configuration Snapshot.
- 5. Upload and install the update via Device > Software > Upload, then install (Device > Software > Install).
- 6. For Prisma Access 2.1 Preferred/Innovation tenants, contact Palo Alto Networks for the specific Prisma Access update.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the SCEP feature configuration and confirm no unauthorized changes exist.
- 8. Review GlobalProtect interface access controls to ensure only authorized networks can reach the SCEP service.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-3060 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-3060 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data