CVE-2021-31231
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Alertmanager in Grafana Enterprise Metrics before 1.2.1 and Metrics Enterprise 1.2.1 has a local file disclosure vulnerability when experimental.alertmanager.enable-api is used. The HTTP basic auth password_file can be used as an attack vector to send any file content via a webhook. The alertmanager templates can be used as an attack vector to send any file content because the alertmanager can load any text file specified in the templates list.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a local file disclosure vulnerability in Grafana Enterprise Metrics and Metrics Enterprise (before 1.2.1). When the experimental.alertmanager.enable-api feature is enabled, an authenticated attacker can read arbitrary local files by leveraging either the HTTP basic auth password_file configuration or alertmanager template file loading capability, then exfiltrate the file contents via webhooks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Grafana Enterprise Metrics is installedLocate the Grafana Enterprise Metrics binary or installation directory. Check the installed version using 'gem -v' or 'grafana-enterprise-metrics --version' if available, or examine version metadata in the installation package.Affected if The installed version is below 1.2.1
-
Verify the experimental.alertmanager.enable-api feature flagInspect the Grafana Enterprise Metrics configuration file (typically grafana-enterprise-metrics.yml or similar) for the setting 'experimental.alertmanager.enable-api' and confirm whether it is set to true or enabled.Affected if The feature flag experimental.alertmanager.enable-api is set to true or enabled in the configuration
-
Check for HTTP basic auth with password_file configuredSearch the configuration files for any [auth.basic] section or 'password_file' directive that references a local file path for storing passwords.Affected if HTTP basic authentication is enabled with a password_file configuration pointing to a local file path
-
Identify alertmanager webhook configurationsLook for alertmanager configuration files or sections that define webhook receivers, particularly any that reference template files via 'template' directives.Affected if Alertmanager webhook receivers with template file references are configured
A user is affected if they run Grafana Enterprise Metrics version below 1.2.1 AND have experimental.alertmanager.enable-api enabled, with either HTTP basic auth using password_file or alertmanager webhook templates configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data1.2.1
Upgrade to version 1.2.1 or later, or disable the experimental.alertmanager.enable-api feature if not required in production environments.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31231 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31231 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data