CVE-2021-31375
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Input Validation vulnerability in routing process daemon (RPD) of Juniper Networks Junos OS devices configured with BGP origin validation using Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI), allows an attacker to send a specific BGP update which may cause RPKI policy-checks to be bypassed. This, in turn, may allow a spoofed advertisement to be accepted or propagated. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 12.3 versions prior to 12.3R12-S18; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7-S9; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R3-S3; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S7; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S9, 17.4R3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S13; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S3; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S1; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R3; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R2; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R2; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper input validation in Junos OS RPD allows attackers to bypass BGP origin validation when RPKI is configured. By sending specially crafted BGP updates, an attacker can cause RPKI policy-checks to be circumvented, enabling spoofed route advertisements to be accepted and propagated throughout the BGP domain.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.3= 15.1= 17.2= 17.3= 17.4= 18.1= 18.2= 18.3= 18.4= 19.1= 19.2= 19.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Junos OS versionExecute `show version` on the device CLI to retrieve the exact Junos version installedAffected if The version matches any of these: 12.3, 15.1, 17.2, 17.3, 17.4, 18.1, 18.2, 18.3, 18.4, 19.1, 19.2, or 19.3 (any subversion) - these are the affected versions listed in the CVE
-
Verify RPKI is configuredExecute `show configuration | display json | match rpki` or inspect the BGP configuration with `show configuration protocols bgp` to see if RPKI (origin validation) is definedAffected if RPKI configuration lines are present under the BGP protocol stanza, meaning RPKI-based origin validation is enabled on the device
-
Confirm RPKI connections are activeExecute `show rpki connections` to check if the device has active RPKI validator sessionsAffected if The output shows active connections to RPKI validators, confirming RPKI is actively in use for BGP route validation
-
Check BGP origin validation policyExecute `show policy` or `show configuration policy-options` to review any BGP origin-validation policies appliedAffected if Origin validation policies are applied to BGP peer groups or routing instances, meaning RPKI validation results are being used to filter routes
The device is affected if it runs any Junos version listed as affected AND has RPKI (BGP origin validation) configured and actively used, because the vulnerability specifically bypasses RPKI validation checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS to the fixed versions specified in the vendor advisory (12.3R12-S18, 15.1R7-S9, 17.2R3-S3, 17.3R3-S7, 17.4R2-S9, 17.4R3, 18.1R3-S13, 18.2R3-S3, 18.3R3-S1, 18.4R3, 19.1R2, 19.2R2, or 19.3R2 or later). If immediate upgrade is not feasible, consider disabling BGP origin validation or implementing additional BGP route filtering as a compensating control.
12.3 to 12.3R12-S18; 15.1 to 15.1R7-S9; 17.2 to 17.2R3-S3; 17.3 to 17.3R3-S7; 17.4 to 17.4R2-S9 or 17.4R3; 18.1 to 18.1R3-S13; 18.2 to 18.2R3-S3; 18.3 to 18.3R3-S1; 18.4 to 18.4R3; 19.1 to 19.1R2; 19.2 to 19.2R2; 19.3 to 19.3R2
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version by running 'show version' on the device
- 2. Identify which affected version branch your device is running (12.3, 15.1, 17.2, 17.3, 17.4, 18.1, 18.2, 18.3, 18.4, 19.1, 19.2, or 19.3)
- 3. Determine the appropriate fixed release for your version branch from the upgrade path list
- 4. Download the recommended Junos Service Release (SPR) or main release from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 5. Upload the Junos upgrade package to the device using 'file copy' or USB transfer
- 6. Perform a system upgrade using 'request system software add <package>' command
- 7. After upgrade completes, reboot the device using 'request system reboot'
- 8. After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31375 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31375 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data