CVE-2021-31376
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Packet Forwarding Engine manager (FXPC) process of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending specific DHCPv6 packets to the device and crashing the FXPC service. Continued receipt and processing of this specific packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects only the following platforms in ACX Series: ACX500, ACX1000, ACX1100, ACX2100, ACX2200, ACX4000, ACX5048, ACX5096 devices. Other ACX platforms are not affected from this issue. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on ACX500, ACX1000, ACX1100, ACX2100, ACX2200, ACX4000, ACX5048, ACX5096: 18.4 version 18.4R3-S7 and later versions prior to 18.4R3-S8. This issue does not affect: Juniper Networks Junos OS 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R3-S7 on ACX500, ACX1000, ACX1100, ACX2100, ACX2200, ACX4000, ACX5048, ACX5096.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper input validation vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine manager (FXPC) process of Juniper Junos OS allows remote attackers to cause denial of service by sending specific DHCPv6 packets to affected ACX Series devices (ACX500, ACX1000, ACX1100, ACX2100, ACX2200, ACX4000, ACX5048, ACX5096). The malicious packets crash the FXPC service, and continued receipt creates a sustained DoS condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 18.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is affected ACX SeriesRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' to identify the exact ACX model (ACX500, ACX1000, ACX1100, ACX2100, ACX2200, ACX4000, ACX5048, or ACX5096)Affected if Device is any of these eight ACX Series models
-
Check Junos OS version is exactly 18.4Run 'show version' and locate the Junos OS version string; look for version 18.4 without any R suffix or with any R1-R7 variant (these are NOT affected, only exact version 18.4)Affected if Version string shows exactly 18.4 (no R1-R7 suffix)
-
Verify DHCPv6 service is configured or activeRun 'show configuration | match dhcpv6' or 'show system services dhcpv6' to check if DHCPv6 processing is enabled on the deviceAffected if DHCPv6 service is configured and active on the device
-
Check if FXPC process is runningRun 'show system processes' or 'request system process' to verify the fxpc (Packet Forwarding Engine manager) process is activeAffected if FXPC process is running on the device
Device is affected if it is an ACX Series model (ACX500/ACX1000/ACX1100/ACX2100/ACX2200/ACX4000/ACX5048/ACX5096) running exactly Junos OS version 18.4 with DHCPv6 service enabled and FXPC process active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS to version 18.4R3-S8 or later on affected ACX Series devices. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider filtering DHCPv6 traffic at network perimeter to reduce attack surface.
Junos OS 18.4R3-S8 or later 18.4 stable release
- 1. Identify the device model - confirm it is one of: ACX500, ACX1000, ACX1100, ACX2100, ACX2200, ACX4000, ACX5048, or ACX5096
- 2. Check current Junos OS version using 'show version' command
- 3. Confirm the current version is 18.4R3-S7 or later but prior to 18.4R3-S8 (vulnerable range)
- 4. Download Junos OS 18.4R3-S8 or a later stable 18.4 release from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 5. Upload the firmware to the device using 'request system software add' or through the web management interface
- 6. Reboot the device to apply the new firmware using 'request system reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version is installed using 'show version'
- 8. Verify the FXPC process is running normally using 'show system processes extensive | match fxpc'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31376 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31376 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data