CVE-2021-31382
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn PTX1000 System, PTX10002-60C System, after upgrading to an affected release, a Race Condition vulnerability between the chassis daemon (chassisd) and firewall process (dfwd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS, may update the device's interfaces with incorrect firewall filters. This issue only occurs when upgrading the device to an affected version of Junos OS. Interfaces intended to have protections may have no protections assigned to them. Interfaces with one type of protection pattern may have alternate protections assigned to them. Interfaces intended to have no protections may have protections assigned to them. These firewall rule misassignments may allow genuine traffic intended to be stopped at the interface to propagate further, potentially causing disruptions in services by propagating unwanted traffic. An attacker may be able to take advantage of these misassignments. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on PTX1000 System: 17.2 versions 17.2R1 and later versions prior to 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S12; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R3-S5; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S13; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S8; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S5; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S8, 18.4R2-S8, 18.4R3-S8; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R3-S5; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R3-S2; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S6, 19.3R3-S3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S4, 19.4R3-S3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R2-S3, 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2-S1, 20.3R3; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R1-S1, 20.4R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS prior to version 17.2R1 on PTX1000 System. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on PTX10002-60C System: 18.2 versions 18.2R1 and later versions prior to 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R3-S9; 19.1 versions later than 19.1R1 prior to 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S5, 19.4R3-S5; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S1; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S2; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S1; 20.4 versions 20.4R1 and later versions prior to 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R2; 21.2 versions 21.2R1 and later versions prior to 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS prior to version 18.2R1 on PTX10002-60C System. This issue impacts all filter families (inet, inet6, etc.) and all loopback filters. It does not rely upon the location where a filter is set, impacting both logical and physical interfaces.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition vulnerability between the chassis daemon (chassisd) and firewall process (dfwd) in Juniper Junos OS causes incorrect firewall filter assignments to interfaces after upgrading affected devices. This leads to three failure modes: protected interfaces lose their filters, interfaces receive wrong filter types, or unprotected interfaces incorrectly receive filters. The issue affects all filter families (inet, inet6) and impacts both logical and physical interfaces on PTX1000 and PTX10002-60C systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 17.2= 17.2x75= 17.3= 17.4= 18.1= 18.2= 18.3= 18.4= 19.1= 19.2= 19.3= 19.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify hardware modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' to confirm the device model is PTX1000 or PTX10002-60CAffected if Device model is PTX1000 or PTX10002-60C
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' and compare the installed Junos version against the affected list: 17.2, 17.2x75, 17.3, 17.4, 18.1, 18.2, 18.3, 18.4, 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4Affected if Installed version matches one of the affected versions listed
-
Verify firewall filter configurationRun 'show configuration firewall' to list all defined firewall filters, then run 'show configuration interfaces <interface-name> family <inet|inet6> filter' to check which filters are applied to each interfaceAffected if Firewall filters are configured on interfaces (the race condition affects filter assignments)
-
Confirm filter-to-interface binding correctnessFor each interface with a filter, run 'show interface <interface-name> extensive | grep filter' or 'show firewall' to verify the applied filter matches the intended configurationAffected if Any interface shows a filter that does not match the configured assignment, or a protected interface shows no filter, or an unprotected interface shows an unexpected filter
Device is affected if it is a PTX1000 or PTX10002-60C running an affected Junos version AND firewall filter assignments do not match the intended configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS to the fixed versions specified in the advisory. After upgrade, verify all firewall filter assignments are correctly applied to intended interfaces, as filters may need to be reconfigured if misassigned during the upgrade process.
Upgrade to the latest service release in your version branch: PTX1000 - 17.3R3-S12 or later for 17.2.x, 17.4R3-S5 or later for 17.4.x, 18.1R3-S13 or later for 18.1.x, 18.2R3-S8 or later for 18.2.x, 18.3R3-S5 or later for 18.3.x, 18.4R3-S8 or later for 18.4.x, 19.1R3-S5 or later for 19.1.x, 19.2R3-S2
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the PTX1000 or PTX10002-60C device using 'show version'
- 2. Determine the appropriate fixed release based on the current version branch (e.g., for 17.2.x upgrade to 17.3R3-S12, for 17.4.x upgrade to 17.4R3-S5)
- 3. Download the appropriate Junos OS service release from the Juniper Networks website
- 4. Before upgrading, backup the current configuration using 'request system configuration backup'
- 5. Upload the new Junos OS package to the device using 'request system software add <package>'
- 6. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new Junos OS version is installed using 'show version'
- 8. Verify firewall filter assignments are correct using 'show firewall' and 'show interfaces <interface> filter'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31382 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31382 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data