Foxit ReaderApplication · Foxitsoftware

CVE-2021-31453

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-05-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.1.3.37598 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA Forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13092.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a use-after-free or null pointer dereference vulnerability in Foxit Reader's XFA Forms handling. The application fails to validate that an object exists before performing operations on it, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a malicious PDF file or webpage. User interaction is required (opening a malicious file or visiting a malicious page).

MitigationUpdate Foxit Reader to the latest patched version released by Foxit Software. Organizations should deploy the update through their patch management systems and verify completion across all endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Foxit ReaderApplication
Affected:<= 10.1.3.37598
PhantompdfApplication
Affected:<= 9.7.5.29616>= 10.0.0.0, <= 10.1.3.37598

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Foxit Reader version
    Open Foxit Reader, go to Help > About Foxit Reader, or check Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel. The version number is displayed in the format X.X.X.XXXXX
    Affected if Version is 10.1.3.37598 or lower (any version up to and including 10.1.3.37598)
  2. Check installed PhantomPDF version
    Open PhantomPDF, go to Help > About PhantomPDF, or check Add/Remove Programs in Control Panel. The version number is displayed in the format X.X.X.XXXXX
    Affected if Version is 9.7.5.29616 or lower, OR between 10.0.0.0 and 10.1.3.37598 inclusive
  3. Verify XFA Forms feature usage
    Check if the user frequently opens PDF forms that use XFA (XML Forms Architecture). These are typically dynamic PDF forms. Open a PDF in Foxit and check the document properties or try filling form fields - XFA forms will show as dynamic or have specific form handling behavior
    Affected if XFA Forms are commonly used/opened in the environment (the vulnerability only triggers when processing XFA-based PDF forms)
  4. Check for recent PDF handling activity
    Review recent documents opened or browser history if Foxit browser plugin is installed. Look for PDF files from untrusted sources opened around the CVE disclosure date
    Affected if User has opened PDF files from untrusted or unknown sources, especially dynamic/form-based PDFs

Environment is affected if Foxit Reader version is 10.1.3.37598 or lower, or PhantomPDF version is 9.7.5.29616 or lower or between 10.0.0.0 and 10.1.3.37598, AND users open or process XFA-based PDF forms which is the attack vector for this vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.1.3.37598
Interim mitigation

Update Foxit Reader to the latest patched version released by Foxit Software. Organizations should deploy the update through their patch management systems and verify completion across all endpoints.

Fix this in Foxit Reader Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31453 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31453 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data