CVE-2021-31851
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Reflected Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in McAfee Policy Auditor prior to 6.5.2 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the profileNodeID request parameters. The malicious script is reflected unmodified into the Policy Auditor web-based interface which could lead to the extraction of end user session token or login credentials. These may be used to access additional security-critical applications or conduct arbitrary cross-domain requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceReflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in McAfee Policy Auditor web interface. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject malicious JavaScript through the profileNodeID request parameter, which is reflected unmodified into the application's response page. This allows session hijacking via stolen session tokens or credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify McAfee Policy Auditor installationCheck if McAfee Policy Auditor is installed on the system by looking for its installation directory (typically in Program Files\McAfee\Policy Auditor) or checking installed programs via Windows Control Panel or registry keys under HKLM\SOFTWARE\McAfee\Policy AuditorAffected if McAfee Policy Auditor is not installed - not affected. If installed, proceed to version check.
-
Determine installed versionLocate the Policy Auditor version information - commonly found in the product's about section, in the installation directory (version.ini or similar), or via the McAfee ePO console if managed centrallyAffected if Version is less than 6.5.2 - the environment is vulnerable to this XSS flaw.
-
Confirm web interface is enabledCheck if the Policy Auditor web interface service is running and enabled. This is typically the McAfee Policy Auditor Web Console, often running on port 8443 or 443. Verify the service status via Windows Services or check if the web port is listening.Affected if Web interface is disabled or not installed - the reflected XSS via profileNodeID cannot be triggered, reducing risk.
-
Assess network exposure of web interfaceDetermine if the Policy Auditor web console is accessible from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, reverse proxies, or network segmentation configurationsAffected if Web interface is exposed to unauthenticated/untrusted network access - the vulnerability can be exploited by remote attackers without credentials.
You are affected if McAfee Policy Auditor version is below 6.5.2 AND the web interface is enabled and accessible to the attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.2
Upgrade McAfee Policy Auditor to version 6.5.2 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability. As an interim measure, implement input validation and output encoding on the profileNodeID parameter at the application layer.
Policy Auditor 6.5.2
- 1. Back up the current Policy Auditor configuration and database.
- 2. Review McAfee Knowledge Base (kc.mcafee.com) for upgrade prerequisites and compatibility requirements.
- 3. Download Policy Auditor version 6.5.2 or later from the McAfee download portal.
- 4. Follow the official upgrade documentation to install the new version.
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by logging into the Policy Auditor web interface.
- 6. Confirm the profileNodeID parameter is now properly sanitized and the XSS vulnerability is remediated.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31851 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31851 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data