Code With MeApplication · Jetbrains

CVE-2021-31899

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-05-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2021.1 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In JetBrains Code With Me bundled to the compatible IDEs before version 2021.1, the client could execute code in read-only mode.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In JetBrains Code With Me (a collaborative coding feature in JetBrains IDEs), a vulnerability existed before version 2021.1 that allowed a client connected in read-only mode to execute arbitrary code, bypassing the intended read-only access restrictions. This represents an authorization bypass where the security control enforcing read-only access was not properly enforced.

MitigationUpgrade JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, WebStorm, PyCharm, etc.) to version 2021.1 or later to receive the patched Code With Me component.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Code With MeApplication
Affected:< 2021.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Code With Me plugin is installed
    Open JetBrains IDE (IntelliJ IDEA, WebStorm, PyCharm, etc.), go to Settings/Preferences > Plugins, and look for 'Code With Me' in the installed plugins list
    Affected if Code With Me plugin is present and enabled in the IDE
  2. Determine IDE version
    In the IDE, go to Help > About (on Windows/Linux) or JetBrains IDE > About (on macOS). The version number is displayed (for example, 2020.3, 2020.2, etc.)
    Affected if The IDE version is older than 2021.1 (such as 2020.3, 2020.2, 2020.1, etc.)
  3. Confirm read-only access is in use
    Check if the IDE is being used in a collaborative session where read-only access was granted to another user. Look for the Code With Me status indicator in the status bar or the participants list in the collaboration dialog
    Affected if A Code With Me session is active where the local user has granted read-only access to a remote participant
  4. Compare version against affected range
    If Code With Me is installed, cross-reference the IDE version found in step 2 with the affected range: any version prior to 2021.1 is vulnerable
    Affected if IDE version is listed as 2020.x or any version number lower than 2021.1

A user is affected if Code With Me is installed and the JetBrains IDE version is 2020.x or any version prior to 2021.1, especially when read-only collaboration sessions are active.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2021.1 or later
Fixed in 2021.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ IDEA, WebStorm, PyCharm, etc.) to version 2021.1 or later to receive the patched Code With Me component.

Recommended fix High confidence

JetBrains IDEs with Code With Me version 2021.1 or later

  1. Open your JetBrains IDE and navigate to Help > About to check the current Code With Me version
  2. Ensure your IDE version includes Code With Me version 2021.1 or later
  3. If running an IDE version earlier than 2021.1, upgrade your JetBrains IDE to version 2021.1 or later which bundles the fixed Code With Me plugin
  4. After upgrade, verify the Code With Me plugin version is 2021.1 or higher in Settings > Plugins

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Code With Me Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31899 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31899 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data