Python PostoriusApplication · Opensuse

CVE-2021-31997

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-06-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.3.2-lp152.1.2 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following vulnerability in python-postorius of openSUSE Leap 15.2, Factory allows local attackers to escalate from users postorius or postorius-admin to root. This issue affects: openSUSE Leap 15.2 python-postorius version 1.3.2-lp152.1.2 and prior versions. openSUSE Factory python-postorius version 1.3.4-2.1 and prior versions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following vulnerability in python-postorius allows local attackers with access to the postorius or postorius-admin user accounts to escalate privileges to root. The vulnerability stems from insecure file handling where the application follows symlinks when creating or accessing files, enabling attackers to manipulate file system operations to overwrite sensitive system files or gain unauthorized access.

MitigationUpgrade python-postorius to a version beyond 1.3.2-lp152.1.2 (Leap 15.2) or 1.3.4-2.1 (Factory) that includes proper symlink validation. Until patched, restrict access to the postorius user account and monitor for suspicious file creation in system directories.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Python PostoriusApplication
Affected:< 1.3.2-lp152.1.2<= 1.3.4-2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed python-postorius version
    Run 'rpm -q python-postorius' or 'zypper se -i python-postorius' to retrieve the installed package version
    Affected if The version is below 1.3.2-lp152.1.2 (for Leap 15.2) or at or below 1.3.4-2.1 (for Factory/Tumbleweed)
  2. Verify postorius system user exists
    Run 'id postorius' or 'getent passwd postorius' to check if the postorius user account is present on the system
    Affected if The postorius user account exists - this is the account that could be exploited for privilege escalation
  3. Check postorius-admin user account
    Run 'id postorius-admin' or 'getent passwd postorius-admin' to verify if this elevated-privilege account exists
    Affected if The postorius-admin user account exists - per the CVE, attackers with access to either account can escalate to root
  4. Identify postorius data directories with writable permissions
    Locate directories used by postorius (commonly /var/lib/postorius, /var/cache/postorius, or the application's data directory) and check permissions with 'ls -la <directory>' - look for world-writable or postorius-owned writable directories
    Affected if There are directories writable by the postorius user where symlinks could be created to overwrite sensitive system files

A system is affected if python-postorius version is below 1.3.2-lp152.1.2 or at or below 1.3.4-2.1 AND the postorius or postorius-admin user account exists with access to writable directories that could be exploited via symlink manipulation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.3.2-lp152.1.2 or later
Fixed in 1.3.2-lp152.1.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade python-postorius to a version beyond 1.3.2-lp152.1.2 (Leap 15.2) or 1.3.4-2.1 (Factory) that includes proper symlink validation. Until patched, restrict access to the postorius user account and monitor for suspicious file creation in system directories.

Fix this in Python Postorius Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $5,940
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31997 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31997 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data