CVE-2021-32010
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInadequate Encryption Strength vulnerability in TLS stack of Secomea SiteManager, LinkManager, GateManager may facilitate man in the middle attacks. This issue affects: Secomea SiteManager All versions prior to 9.7. Secomea LinkManager versions prior to 9.7. Secomea GateManager versions prior to 9.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInadequate encryption strength in the TLS stack allows man-in-the-middle attacks. The vulnerability stems from support for weak cipher suites or outdated TLS protocols in Secomea SiteManager, LinkManager, and GateManager prior to version 9.7, enabling attackers to intercept or manipulate encrypted communications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.7.622134021< 9.7.622134021< 9.7.622134021< 9.7.622134021< 9.7.622134021< 9.7.622134021< 9.7.622134021< 9.7.622134021CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SiteManager model numberLocate the model identifier on the device label, web interface dashboard, or system status page. The affected models are 1129, 1139, 1149, 3329, 3339, 3349, 3529, and 3539.Affected if The device is one of these model numbers.
-
Determine the installed firmware versionAccess the Secomea SiteManager web interface and navigate to the System Status or About page to view the firmware version. Alternatively, use the CLI command 'version' or 'show system info' if available.Affected if The firmware version is below 9.7.622134021.
-
Check TLS protocol configurationAccess the SiteManager SSL/TLS settings through the web interface under Security or Network configuration. Verify which TLS protocol versions are enabled (TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, or TLS 1.2).Affected if TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1 is enabled.
-
Check cipher suite configurationNavigate to the SSL/TLS cipher configuration section in the web interface. Review the list of enabled cipher suites for presence of weak or export-grade ciphers (such as RC4, 3DES, or NULL encryption).Affected if Weak cipher suites are enabled or the configuration allows legacy ciphers.
A user is affected if they run a SiteManager model 1129/1139/1149/3329/3339/3349/3529/3539 with firmware below 9.7.622134021 and have weak TLS protocols or cipher suites enabled in the configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.7.622134021
Upgrade Secomea SiteManager, LinkManager, and GateManager to version 9.7 or later to remediate the weak TLS encryption. After upgrading, verify that only strong cipher suites and current TLS protocols are enabled.
Firmware version 9.7.622134021 or later
- Identify the current SiteManager model number and firmware version installed
- Navigate to the Secomea support portal or contact Secomea directly to obtain the fixed firmware version 9.7.622134021 or later
- Follow Secomea's standard firmware upgrade procedure for your SiteManager model
- After upgrade, verify the TLS configuration uses strong cipher suites and that the firmware version is 9.7.622134021 or higher
- Test TLS connectivity to confirm the man-in-the-middle vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-32010 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-32010 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data