EmissaryApplication · Nsa

CVE-2021-32095

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-05-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) Emissary 5.9.0 allows an authenticated user to delete arbitrary files.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

NSA Emissary 5.9.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability allowing authenticated users to delete arbitrary files on the host system via crafted file path requests. This authenticated arbitrary file deletion could lead to denial of service, data loss, or potentially privilege escalation if critical system files are targeted.

MitigationApply vendor patch or update to a patched version of Emissary if available. If no patch exists, restrict network access to the Emissary service to trusted authenticated users only and monitor for suspicious file deletion activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EmissaryApplication
Affected:= 5.9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify installed Emissary version
    Locate the Emissary installation directory and check the version file, startup script, or use the admin interface version information. Common paths include /opt/emissary or the installation root directory. Run: emissary --version or check the about page in the web UI.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 5.9.0
  2. Confirm Emissary service is exposed
    Check if the Emissary web interface or API is accessible on the network. Identify the listening port (typically 8001 for the admin interface) and verify network binding settings in the Emissary configuration.
    Affected if The Emissary service is accessible over the network and accepts connections
  3. Identify authentication configuration
    Review the Emissary configuration files to determine how user authentication is handled. Check for user authentication settings, session management, and whether anonymous or default credentials are enabled.
    Affected if Anonymous access is allowed or weak authentication is configured, allowing unauthenticated or low-privilege access to the file deletion functionality
  4. Review access logs for file deletion operations
    Examine Emissary access and audit logs for DELETE requests or file operation commands with unusual path patterns. Look for sequences like ../ or absolute paths in file deletion parameters.
    Affected if Logs show file deletion requests with path traversal patterns or deletion of files outside expected directories

A user is affected if NSA Emissary version 5.9.0 is running and the service is accessible, particularly if authentication is weak or anonymous access is permitted.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patch or update to a patched version of Emissary if available. If no patch exists, restrict network access to the Emissary service to trusted authenticated users only and monitor for suspicious file deletion activity.

Fix this in Emissary Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-32095 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-32095 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data