CVE-2021-32778
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEnvoy is an open source L7 proxy and communication bus designed for large modern service oriented architectures. In affected versions envoy’s procedure for resetting a HTTP/2 stream has O(N^2) complexity, leading to high CPU utilization when a large number of streams are reset. Deployments are susceptible to Denial of Service when Envoy is configured with high limit on H/2 concurrent streams. An attacker wishing to exploit this vulnerability would require a client opening and closing a large number of H/2 streams. Envoy versions 1.19.1, 1.18.4, 1.17.4, 1.16.5 contain fixes to reduce time complexity of resetting HTTP/2 streams. As a workaround users may limit the number of simultaneous HTTP/2 dreams for upstream and downstream peers to a low number, i.e. 100.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceEnvoy's HTTP/2 stream reset procedure exhibits O(N²) complexity, causing exponential CPU consumption when many streams are rapidly opened and closed. Attackers can trigger this DoVulnerability by having a client rapidly open and close HTTP/2 streams, exhausting CPU resources on the Envoy proxy.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.16.0, < 1.16.5>= 1.17.0, < 1.17.4>= 1.18.0, < 1.18.4= 1.19.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine Envoy versionRun 'envoy --version' or check the container/service metadata to identify the installed Envoy versionAffected if The version falls in these ranges: >=1.16.0,<1.16.5 OR >=1.17.0,<1.17.4 OR >=1.18.0,<1.18.4 OR =1.19.0
-
Identify HTTP/2 listener configurationReview Envoy configuration files for 'http2_protocol_options' in listener or route definitions, or check if HTTP/2 is negotiated via ALPN or h2 upgradeAffected if HTTP/2 protocol is enabled on any upstream or downstream listener handling external traffic
-
Check concurrent stream limitsInspect Envoy config for 'max_concurrent_streams' setting under http2_protocol_options or http_protocol_options in listener and cluster definitionsAffected if No explicit max_concurrent_streams limit is set, or the limit is set higher than 100, allowing unlimited stream creation
-
Verify exposed HTTP/2 endpointsReview Envoy listener configurations to identify exposed services accepting HTTP/2 connections from untrusted clientsAffected if Public-facing or untrusted clients can establish HTTP/2 connections to Envoy listeners without rate limiting
You are affected if you run an affected Envoy version (1.16.0-1.16.4, 1.17.0-1.17.3, 1.18.0-1.18.3, or 1.19.0) with HTTP/2 enabled and no effective stream concurrency limits, allowing remote clients to trigger excessive CPU consumption via rapid stream open/close cycles.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.16.51.17.41.18.4
Upgrade Envoy to versions 1.19.1, 1.18.4, 1.17.4, or 1.16.5 which contain the optimized stream reset logic, or temporarily apply the workaround of limiting concurrent HTTP/2 streams to 100 via upstream/downstream configuration.
1.19.1 (if on 1.19.x), 1.18.4 (if on 1.18.x), 1.17.4 (if on 1.17.x), or 1.16.5 (if on 1.16.x)
- 1. Identify the current Envoy version in use (e.g., via envoy --version or admin /server_info endpoint)
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on (1.16.x, 1.17.x, 1.18.x, or 1.19.0)
- 3. Upgrade Envoy to the fixed patch version for your branch: 1.16.5, 1.17.4, 1.18.4, or 1.19.1
- 4. Verify the upgrade by checking envoy --version shows the patched release
- 5. Test the new version in a staging environment before deploying to production
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-32778 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-32778 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data