CVE-2021-32949
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn attacker could utilize a function in MDT AutoSave versions prior to v6.02.06 that permits changing a designated path to another path and traversing the directory, allowing the replacement of an existing file with a malicious file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMDT AutoSave versions prior to v6.02.06 contain a path traversal vulnerability in a function that allows users to change a designated file path. By manipulating the path with directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../), an attacker can write arbitrary files to locations outside the intended directory, potentially overwriting system files or deploying malicious payloads.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.02.06>= 7.00, <= 7.04< 4.01= 5.00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed MDT AutoSave versionLocate the MDT AutoSave installation and retrieve the version information, typically found in the software's about dialog, installation directory, or system registry entry for the programAffected if The installed version is any version prior to 6.02.06, or any version from 7.00 through 7.04, or any version prior to 4.01 for System Platform variant, or exactly version 5.00 for System Platform variant
-
Confirm the product variantDetermine whether the installation is standard MDT AutoSave or MDT AutoSave For System Platform, as each has distinct affected version rangesAffected if Running MDT AutoSave For System Platform versions 5.00 or versions prior to 4.01
-
Verify if the file path modification feature is accessibleCheck whether the function that allows users to change a designated file path is enabled and accessible to users or processesAffected if The file path change feature is active and accepts user-supplied input without validation
-
Inspect recent file write operationsReview system logs, application logs, or file system activity for any write operations that occurred outside the intended designated directory, particularly looking for files written using directory traversal sequencesAffected if Any file writes detected outside the expected directory bounds, or files containing ../ patterns in their paths
A user is affected if their installed version falls within the affected ranges (prior to 6.02.06, or 7.00-7.04 for main product; or prior to 4.01 or exactly 5.00 for System Platform) AND the file path modification feature is accessible and operational in their environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.016.02.06
Upgrade to MDT AutoSave v6.02.06 or later which contains the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement input validation and access controls on file operations to prevent directory traversal.
Autosave: v6.02.06 or later (or version beyond 7.04); Autosave For System Platform: v4.01 or later
- 1. Identify the currently installed MDT AutoSave product and version in your environment
- 2. If using Autosave, verify if version is < 6.02.06 or between 7.00 and 7.04 (inclusive)
- 3. If using Autosave For System Platform, verify if version is < 4.01 or equals 5.00
- 4. Obtain the appropriate fixed version: Upgrade Autosave to v6.02.06 or later (for version 7.x, upgrade to a version beyond 7.04)
- 5. For Autosave For System Platform, upgrade to v4.01 or later
- 6. Download the patched version from the official vendor (Schneider Electric) or through your normal update channel
- 7. Apply the update following standard change management procedures
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful and test that the application functions normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-32949 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-32949 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data