CVE-2021-33285
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn NTFS-3G versions < 2021.8.22, when a specially crafted NTFS attribute is supplied to the function ntfs_get_attribute_value, a heap buffer overflow can occur allowing for memory disclosure or denial of service. The vulnerability is caused by an out-of-bound buffer access which can be triggered by mounting a crafted ntfs partition. The root cause is a missing consistency check after reading an MFT record : the "bytes_in_use" field should be less than the "bytes_allocated" field. When it is not, the parsing of the records proceeds into the wild.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNTFS-3G versions before 2021.8.22 contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the ntfs_get_attribute_value function. The flaw is caused by a missing consistency check when parsing MFT records - the code fails to verify that the 'bytes_in_use' field is less than 'bytes_allocated', allowing an attacker to trigger out-of-bounds memory access by mounting a specially crafted NTFS partition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 8.0= 33= 34= 35= 9.0= 10.0= 11.0< 2021.8.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if NTFS-3G is installedRun 'rpm -q ntfs-3g' on RHEL/Fedora or 'dpkg -l ntfs-3g' on Debian. Alternatively, run 'which ntfs-3g' or 'ntfs-3g --version'.Affected if The package or binary is present on the system
-
Determine the installed NTFS-3G versionRun 'ntfs-3g --version' or check the package version via 'rpm -q ntfs-3g' / 'dpkg -s ntfs-3g'. Compare the version number to the fixed release 2021.8.22.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 2021.8.22
-
Check if NTFS kernel module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep ntfs' to see if the ntfs kernel module is loaded, or check /proc/filesystems for ntfs fuseblk entries.Affected if NTFS support is available in the kernel or via FUSE
-
Identify processes or services that mount NTFS partitionsReview running processes for ntfs-3g usage via 'ps aux | grep ntfs', check /etc/fstab for NTFS entries, and review any automount or media mounting configurations.Affected if The system is configured to automatically mount NTFS partitions from external or untrusted sources
-
Check for cron jobs or systemd units that mount NTFSReview /etc/cron* directories and systemd service/timer units for scripts or commands that invoke ntfs-3g or mount NTFS filesystems.Affected if Scheduled or triggered tasks exist that mount NTFS partitions
The system is affected if NTFS-3G version is installed and is earlier than 2021.8.22, and the system can mount NTFS partitions (including from external or untrusted sources).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2021.8.22
Upgrade NTFS-3G to version 2021.8.22 or later. Avoid mounting untrusted NTFS partitions until the upgrade is applied.
NTFS-3G version 2021.8.22 or later
- Check current NTFS-3G version installed: run `ntfs-3g --version`
- For Debian/Ubuntu: Run `apt-get update && apt-get install ntfs-3g` to install the latest version
- For Fedora: Run `dnf update ntfs-3g`
- For RHEL/CentOS: Run `yum update ntfs-3g` or enable EPEL repository and run `yum install ntfs-3g`
- Verify the fix by running `ntfs-3g --version` and confirming it shows version 2021.8.22 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-33285 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-33285 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data