SingularityApplication · Sylabs

CVE-2021-33622

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-06-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.5-8 / 3.7.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Sylabs Singularity 3.5.x and 3.6.x, and SingularityPRO before 3.5-8, has an Incorrect Check of a Function's Return Value.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A vulnerability in Sylabs Singularity container runtime versions 3.5.x, 3.6.x, and SingularityPRO before 3.5-8 involves an incorrect check of a function's return value. This could allow an attacker to bypass security controls, potentially leading to container escape or privilege escalation due to improper error handling in the container execution path.

MitigationUpgrade Singularity to version 3.5-8 or later for SingularityPRO, or to 3.7.0+ for standard releases. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict untrusted users from running Singularity containers and enable available security mechanisms.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SingularityApplication
Affected:>= 3.5.0, < 3.7.0
SingularityproApplication
Affected:< 3.5-8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Singularity version installed
    Run `singularity --version` to retrieve the installed version number
    Affected if Version is 3.5.0 through 3.6.x, or version is 3.7.0 or higher (only 3.5.0 to <3.7.0 are affected per the CVE)
  2. Confirm SingularityPRO edition
    If using SingularityPRO, check the specific version with `singularity --version` and verify it is not version 3.5-8 or later
    Affected if Running SingularityPRO with version lower than 3.5-8
  3. Identify who can execute Singularity
    Check /etc/subuid and /etc/subgid for user mappings, and review permissions on the singularity binary with `ls -la $(which singularity)`
    Affected if Untrusted or unprivileged users have access to run Singularity containers, enabling the exploitation path
  4. Review container execution permissions
    Inspect any Singularity definition files or container runtime policies in the environment to determine if users can execute containers without root privileges
    Affected if Non-root users can execute containers, which combined with a vulnerable version creates the bypass condition

You are affected if Singularity version is 3.5.0 or higher but below 3.7.0 (or SingularityPRO below 3.5-8) AND untrusted users can execute containers in your environment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.5-8 / 3.7.0 or later
Fixed in 3.5-83.7.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Singularity to version 3.5-8 or later for SingularityPRO, or to 3.7.0+ for standard releases. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict untrusted users from running Singularity containers and enable available security mechanisms.

Recommended fix High confidence

Singularity 3.7.0+ or SingularityPRO 3.5-8+

  1. Check current Singularity version by running: singularity --version
  2. For Singularity: Upgrade to version 3.7.0 or later
  3. For SingularityPRO: Upgrade to version 3.5-8 or later
  4. Verify the upgrade was successful by running: singularity --version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Singularity Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,540
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-33622 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-33622 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data