CVE-2021-34145
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Bluetooth Classic implementation in the Cypress WICED BT stack through 2.9.0 for CYW20735B1 devices does not properly handle the reception of LMP_max_slot with an invalid Baseband packet type (and LT_ADDRESS and LT_ADDR) after completion of the LMP setup procedure, allowing attackers in radio range to trigger a denial of service (firmware crash) via a crafted LMP packet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Cypress WICED BT stack for CYW20735B1 devices fails to properly validate LMP_max_slot messages containing invalid Baseband packet types (with invalid LT_ADDRESS and LT_ADDR fields) after the LMP setup procedure completes. This allows nearby attackers to send crafted LMP packets that cause a firmware crash and denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Bluetooth chipsetCheck device documentation, BOM (bill of materials), or use Bluetooth host tooling (e.g., hcitool, btmgmt) to query the controller for chipset identification. Look for Cypress CYW20735B1 or Broadcom/Infineon Bluetooth silicon.Affected if The device uses a CYW20735B1 chipset
-
Check the WICED BT stack versionConsult device firmware release notes, system logs, or contact the device vendor/manufacturer to obtain the installed WICED BT stack version. This is typically embedded in the Bluetooth firmware and not easily readable via standard host tools.Affected if The WICED BT stack version is 2.9.0 or lower, or the version cannot be determined but the chipset is CYW20735B1
-
Verify Bluetooth is enabledCheck if Bluetooth is actively enabled on the device. On Linux, use 'rfkill list' or 'hciconfig' to see if the Bluetooth controller is powered up. On embedded systems, check system configuration or GPIO states.Affected if Bluetooth is powered on and in discoverable or connectable mode, as the attack requires radio proximity
-
Assess physical exposureEvaluate whether the device operates in a controlled or trusted physical environment. Determine if untrusted individuals could gain radio proximity to the device.Affected if The device is in an environment where untrusted parties could be within Bluetooth radio range
A user is affected if the device contains a CYW20735B1 chipset running WICED BT stack version 2.9.0 or lower, with Bluetooth enabled in an exposed physical setting.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedContact Cypress/Infineon for the patched firmware version. If no patch is available, minimize exposure by restricting physical proximity to trusted Bluetooth environments, as exploitation requires the attacker to be within radio range.
Cypress WICED BT stack version > 2.9.0 (contact Infineon/Cypress for the exact fixed release version)
- 1. Identify the Cypress WICED BT SDK version currently deployed on affected CYW20735B1 devices
- 2. Obtain the latest Cypress WICED BT stack firmware release for CYW20735B1 from the official Cypress/Infineon website
- 3. Review the release notes for the new version to confirm inclusion of the CVE-2021-34134145 fix
- 4. Apply the updated firmware to all affected devices following the standard Cypress firmware upgrade procedure
- 5. Verify the firmware update was successful and the device is functioning normally
- 6. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by testing with a tool that can send crafted LMP packets (if available in a safe test environment)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-34145 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-34145 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data