Dir 2640 Us FirmwareOperating system · Dlink

CVE-2021-34203

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-06-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
86/100
Remediation priority · High
Public exploit No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
D-Link DIR-2640-US 1.01B04 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. Router ac2600 (dir-2640-us), when setting PPPoE, will start quagga process in the way of whole network monitoring, and this function uses the original default password and port. An attacker can easily use telnet to log in, modify routing information, monitor the traffic of all devices under the router, hijack DNS and phishing attacks. In addition, this interface is likely to be questioned by customers as a backdoor, because the interface should not be exposed.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The D-Link DIR-2640-US router firmware 1.01B04 contains an incorrect access control vulnerability where configuring PPPoE starts the quagga routing daemon exposed via telnet using original default credentials and port. This allows unauthenticated attackers to gain full routing control, monitor all network traffic, hijack DNS, and perform phishing attacks.

MitigationRemediate by changing default quagga credentials, disabling or firewall-filtering the telnet access to the routing daemon, and applying any available firmware updates. If PPPoE is not required, disable the feature entirely.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dir 2640 Us FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 1.01b04

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model and firmware version
    Access the router's web interface under Status or Management section, or run 'cat /proc/version' or 'uname -a' via SSH/Telnet if available, to confirm the model is DIR-2640-US and firmware version is 1.01B04
    Affected if The device is a D-Link DIR-2640-US running firmware version 1.01B04
  2. Verify PPPoE configuration status
    Log into the router's web interface and navigate to Internet or WAN settings to check if PPPoE is enabled and configured
    Affected if PPPoE is currently enabled or configured on the router
  3. Check for exposed quagga telnet service
    Use a network port scanner (such as 'nmap' or 'netcat') to scan the router's external IP on port 23 (telnet) or attempt a telnet connection to the router's IP on port 23 to see if the quagga routing daemon is accessible
    Affected if Telnet port 23 is open and responds, or a quagga routing prompt is accessible via telnet
  4. Verify quagga service credentials
    If telnet access to quagga is possible, attempt login with the original default credentials (typically quagga/quagga or admin/admin) to confirm they have not been changed
    Affected if The quagga routing daemon is accessible via telnet using default credentials

The router is affected if it is a D-Link DIR-2640-US on firmware 1.01B04 with PPPoE enabled, and the quagga telnet service is exposed with default credentials still in use.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Remediate by changing default quagga credentials, disabling or firewall-filtering the telnet access to the routing daemon, and applying any available firmware updates. If PPPoE is not required, disable the feature entirely.

Fix this in Dir 2640 Us Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-34203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-34203 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data