Single Sign OnApplication · Redhat

CVE-2021-3424

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-06-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A flaw was found in keycloak as shipped in Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.4 where IDN homograph attacks are possible. A malicious user can register himself with a name already registered and trick admin to grant him extra privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Keycloak 7.4 does not properly validate Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) during user registration, allowing homograph attacks where malicious users can register usernames visually identical to existing users using confusable Unicode characters (e.g., Cyrillic vs Latin letters). This enables privilege escalation by tricking administrators into granting additional access to the wrong account.

MitigationImplement IDN homograph protection by restricting confusable Unicode characters in usernames, enabling punycode representation for display, or implementing visual similarity detection to reject lookalike usernames during registration.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Single Sign OnApplication
Affected:= 7.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Keycloak or RH SSO version
    Check the server version through the admin console, server logs, or by querying the /auth/realms/{realm} endpoint. On RH SSO, also check rpm -q or the installation manifest.
    Affected if The installed version is Red Hat Single Sign-On 7.4 exactly
  2. Confirm user registration is enabled
    Log into the admin console, navigate to Authentication > Flows, and verify the 'Registration' flow is active. Alternatively, check the realm settings under Authentication > Required Actions to see if 'Register' is enabled for users.
    Affected if User self-registration is enabled and accessible to unauthenticated users
  3. Verify IDN homograph protection is configured
    Check the realm configuration for username validator settings. Inspect the 'Regex Pattern' validator applied to the username attribute in user registration or in the user storage configuration. Look for patterns that restrict or reject non-ASCII/confusable Unicode characters.
    Affected if No regex validator or homograph protection is configured to filter confusable Unicode characters like Cyrillic lookalikes
  4. Test for vulnerable IDN character acceptance
    Attempt a test registration using a username containing confusable Unicode characters (for example, Cyrillic letters that visually match Latin letters in your admin account). Submit the registration form and observe whether it succeeds.
    Affected if The system accepts usernames with Unicode characters that are confusable with existing usernames

A user is affected if running RH SSO 7.4 with user registration enabled and without IDN homograph protection configured to reject confusable Unicode characters in usernames.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement IDN homograph protection by restricting confusable Unicode characters in usernames, enabling punycode representation for display, or implementing visual similarity detection to reject lookalike usernames during registration.

Fix this in Single Sign On Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-3424 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-3424 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data