CVE-2021-34698
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the proxy service of Cisco AsyncOS for Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to exhaust system memory and cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper memory management in the proxy service of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by establishing a large number of HTTPS connections to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the system to stop processing new connections, which could result in a DoS condition. Note: Manual intervention may be required to recover from this situation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory exhaustion vulnerability exists in the proxy service of Cisco AsyncOS for Web Security Appliance. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by establishing a large number of HTTPS connections, causing the system to exhaust memory and stop processing new connections, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.0, < 12.0.3-005>= 12.5, < 12.5.2-007>= 14.0, < 14.0.1-014CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check AsyncOS firmware versionAccess the WSA CLI and run the 'version' command, or check via the web UI under System Administration > Device ConfigurationAffected if Version falls in affected ranges: 12.0.x before 12.0.3-005, 12.5.x before 12.5.2-007, or 14.0.x before 14.0.1-014
-
Verify proxy service is enabledIn the WSA web UI, navigate to Security Services > Proxy Settings and confirm the proxy is enabled, or use the CLI command 'proxy status'Affected if Proxy service is currently enabled and running
-
Confirm HTTPS proxy capability is activeIn the WSA web UI under Security Services > HTTPS Proxy, verify that HTTPS scanning/proxy is enabled. The vulnerability is triggered specifically through HTTPS connectionsAffected if HTTPS proxy functionality is enabled and accepting connections
A user is affected if the device runs an affected AsyncOS version listed above AND has the proxy service with HTTPS proxy capability enabled, as the attacker exploits the proxy via HTTPS connections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.0.3-00512.5.2-00714.0.1-014
Apply the Cisco firmware patch when available; in the interim, implement connection rate limiting on the WSA proxy and consider network-level filtering to restrict abnormal connection volumes.
Upgrade to AsyncOS 12.0.3-005, 12.5.2-007, 14.0.1-014 or later respective to your current branch
- 1. Identify the current AsyncOS version on the Cisco Web Security Appliance by running 'version' in the CLI or checking via the web UI.
- 2. Determine which version branch you are currently on (12.0.x, 12.5.x, or 14.0.x) to select the appropriate fixed release.
- 3. Back up the current device configuration using 'backup' command or the web UI before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed AsyncOS software version from Cisco (12.0.3-005, 12.5.2-007, or 14.0.1-014 or later) from the Cisco Software Download center.
- 5. Upload the new AsyncOS image to the WSA via the web UI (System Administration > Software Update) or CLI.
- 6. Install the upgrade and reboot the device when prompted.
- 7. After the device restarts, verify the new AsyncOS version is installed using 'version' command.
- 8. Test that the proxy service is functioning normally and monitor memory usage to confirm the memory leak is resolved.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-34698 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-34698 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data