CVE-2021-34724
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software CLI could allow an authenticated, local attacker to elevate privileges and execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system as the root user. An attacker must be authenticated on an affected device as a PRIV15 user. This vulnerability is due to insufficient file system protection and the presence of a sensitive file in the bootflash directory on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by overwriting an installer file stored in the bootflash directory with arbitrary commands that can be executed with root-level privileges. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to read and write changes to the configuration database on the affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software CLI where an authenticated PRIV15 user can overwrite installer files in the bootflash directory with malicious commands that execute with root-level privileges, allowing read/write access to the configuration database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 17.3.1aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the software typeRun 'show version' or 'show system' to confirm the device is running Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN SoftwareAffected if The output shows IOS XE SD-WAN rather than standard IOS XE
-
Check the installed versionRun 'show version' and locate the version string (for example, 17.3.1, 17.3.1a, or later)Affected if The version number is 17.3.1a or earlier (any version <= 17.3.1a)
-
Confirm PRIV15 user access existsRun 'show privilege' or 'show running-config | include username' to identify if any users with PRIV15 privilege level are configuredAffected if Any user account with privilege level 15 is present on the device
-
Inspect bootflash for installer filesRun 'dir bootflash:' to list files in bootflash and check for unexpected installer files (.bin, .pkg, .tar) that were not intentionally deployedAffected if There are installer files in bootflash that were not explicitly installed by the administrator
A user is affected if the device runs Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN version 17.3.1a or earlier and has PRIV15 user accounts configured, making unauthorized bootflash file modifications possible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco IOS XE software updates addressing CVE-2021-34724; restrict PRIV15-level access to trusted personnel and monitor for unauthorized bootflash file modifications.
Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN 17.3.2 or later (verify exact version in Cisco Security Advisory)
- 1. Identify the current Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN version running on the affected device using 'show version' command
- 2. Access the Cisco Security Advisories page at tools.cisco.com and search for CVE-2021-34724 to confirm the exact fixed release
- 3. Plan an upgrade window during maintenance period as this requires device reload
- 4. Download the fixed IOS XE SD-WAN release (typically 17.3.2 or later) from Cisco Software Download center
- 5. Verify the image integrity using the MD5/SHA256 checksum provided by Cisco
- 6. Copy the new image to bootflash using 'copy <source> bootflash:'
- 7. Set the boot variable to point to the new image using 'boot system bootflash:<new-image-name>'
- 8. Save configuration with 'write memory'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-34724 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-34724 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data