CVE-2021-34741
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the email scanning algorithm of Cisco AsyncOS software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a denial of service (DoS) attack against an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of incoming emails. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email through Cisco ESA. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust all the available CPU resources on an affected device for an extended period of time, preventing other emails from being processed and resulting in a DoS condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the email scanning algorithm of Cisco AsyncOS software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to send crafted emails with insufficient input validation, causing excessive CPU consumption and preventing legitimate email processing.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 13.0.4= 13.5.3-010= 13.7.0-093CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco ESA deviceLog into the AsyncOS CLI and run the 'version' or 'show version' command to confirm the device model is an Email Security Appliance (ESA)Affected if The device is not a Cisco ESA (the vulnerability only affects ESA devices)
-
Check AsyncOS versionRun 'version' or 'show version' in the AsyncOS CLI to display the installed AsyncOS software version numberAffected if The displayed version is < 13.0.4, or exactly matches 13.5.3-010 or 13.7.0-093
-
Verify email scanning is activeRun 'uscan' or 'scan' status command in the CLI, or check the IronPort Text UI (if accessible) to confirm email scanning/filtering services are enabledAffected if Email scanning is disabled, the vulnerability cannot be triggered (the flaw exists in the scanning algorithm itself)
-
Check specific build string for exact versionsRun 'version' and look for the full build string (e.g., '13.5.3-010' or '13.7.0-093') to confirm exact version matchAffected if The build string exactly shows 13.5.3-010 or 13.7.0-093 (these specific builds are vulnerable)
The environment is affected if the device is a Cisco ESA running AsyncOS version < 13.0.4, or exactly build 13.5.3-010 or 13.7.0-093, with email scanning services enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped13.0.4
Apply the Cisco security update/patch for CVE-2021-34741 to the AsyncOS software on the affected ESA devices.
AsyncOS 13.0.4 or later stable release (13.5.x or 13.7.x series beyond the specific vulnerable builds)
- 1. Identify the current AsyncOS version on the Cisco Email Security Appliance using the CLI command: version
- 2. If running a version < 13.0.4, or exactly 13.5.3-010, or exactly 13.7.0-093, plan for an upgrade
- 3. Download the fixed AsyncOS version from Cisco (13.0.4 or later stable release) from tools.cisco.com or the Cisco Software Download center
- 4. Back up the ESA configuration using the saveconfig command
- 5. Upload the AsyncOS upgrade file to the ESA via the GUI (System Administration > Software Update) or CLI
- 6. Install the upgrade and restart the device
- 7. Verify the new version is installed using the version command
- 8. Confirm the email scanning functionality is operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-34741 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-34741 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data