CVE-2021-35036
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cleartext storage of information vulnerability in the Zyxel VMG3625-T50B firmware version V5.50(ABTL.0)b2k could allow an authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information from the configuration file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Zyxel VMG3625-T50B router firmware stores sensitive information in cleartext within its configuration file. An authenticated attacker with access to the device or its configuration backup can read the stored credentials or other sensitive data directly from the unencrypted configuration file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.17\(abpc.2\)c0< 5.50\(abvy.3\)c0< 5.17\(abyo.2\)c0< 5.50\(abpm.7\)c0< 5.50\(abpm.7\)c0< 5.50\(abom.8\)c0< 5.40\(abvh.0\)c0a03< 5.17\(abyo.2\)c0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your device modelCheck the device label or web interface to confirm the exact model number (e.g., VMG3625-T50B, EMG5523-T50b, etc.)Affected if Device model matches one of: Ax7501 B0, Dx3301 T0, Dx5401 B0, Emg3525 T50b, Emg5523 T50b, Emg5723 T50k, Ep240p, Ex5401 B0
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the router web administration interface or use the device CLI to locate the firmware version information; compare it against the affected version thresholdsAffected if Firmware version is below the fixed release for your model: Ax7501 B0 < 5.17(abpc.2)c0, Dx3301 T0 < 5.50(abvy.3)c0, Dx5401 B0 < 5.17(abyo.2)c0, Emg3525 T50b < 5.50(abpm.7)c0, Emg5523 T50b < 5.50(abpm.7)c0, Emg5723 T50k < 5.50(abom.8)c0, Ep240p < 5.40(abvh.0)c0a03, Ex5401 B0 < 5.17(abyo.2)c0
-
Examine the configuration backup fileIf available, obtain a configuration backup or access the configuration file directly on the device; search for stored credentials or sensitive data that appears in plain text rather than obfuscated or encryptedAffected if Configuration file contains username/password pairs or other sensitive information in readable plaintext format
You are affected if your device is one of the listed models and running a firmware version lower than the fixed release, AND your configuration file contains unencrypted sensitive data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.175.405.50
Apply vendor firmware update when available. Until then, restrict administrative access to the device to trusted personnel only and protect configuration file backups from unauthorized access.
Upgrade to firmware version 5.17(abpc.2)c0 or later for Ax7501 B0; 5.50(abvy.3)c0 or later for Dx3301 T0; 5.17(abyo.2)c0 or later for Dx5401 B0/Ex5401 B0; 5.50(abpm.7)c0 or later for Emg3525 T50b/Emg5523 T50b; 5.50(abom.8)c0 or later for Emg5723 T50k; 5.40(abvh.0)c0a03 or later for Ep240p
- 1. Identify the specific Zyxel device model from the affected product list (Ax7501 B0, Dx3301 T0, Dx5401 B0, Emg3525 T50b, Emg5523 T50b, Emg5723 T50k, Ep240p, or Ex5401 B0)
- 2. Determine the current firmware version by accessing the device's web interface or administrative console
- 3. Navigate to the firmware update or administration section of the device
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed firmware version from Zyxel's official support website (www.zyxel.com) for your specific device model
- 5. Upload and apply the firmware update following Zyxel's standard firmware upgrade procedure
- 6. After the firmware update completes, verify the new version matches or exceeds the fixed version for your device
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by checking that sensitive configuration data is no longer stored in cleartext
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,824.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-35036 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-35036 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data