CVE-2021-35083
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPossible out of bound read due to improper validation of certificate chain in SSL or Internet key exchange in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in Snapdragon chipsets due to improper validation of certificate chains during SSL/TLS or Internet Key Exchange (IKE) authentication. This memory safety flaw allows attackers to read sensitive memory contents by presenting a specially crafted malicious certificate, potentially exposing cryptographic keys, credentials, or other sensitive data processed during the handshake.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify chipset modelCheck the device or system documentation, or run commands such as 'cat /proc/cpuinfo', 'lspci', 'lsusb', or check bootloader/SOC information to determine the Qualcomm APQ chipset model (Apq8009, Apq8009w, Apq8017, Apq8037, Apq8053, Apq8096au, Aqt1000, or Ar8031)Affected if The chipset model matches any of the following: Apq8009, Apq8009w, Apq8017, Apq8037, Apq8053, Apq8096au, Aqt1000, or Ar8031
-
Verify SSL/TLS client or server is enabledInspect the device configuration, running processes, or network services to determine if any SSL/TLS-enabled service (HTTPS client/server, OpenSSL, mbed TLS, or proprietary TLS stack) is actively running or configuredAffected if SSL/TLS functionality is enabled and the device performs TLS handshakes with remote endpoints
-
Verify IKE/IPsec is enabledCheck for IKE daemon processes (such as charon, strongSwan, or vendor-specific IKE), IPsec configurations, or VPN services that perform IKE authenticationAffected if IKE authentication for IPsec or VPN is enabled and actively used
-
Check firmware versionQuery the device firmware version through bootloader, AT commands, system info, or vendor-specific interfaces (for example, 'cat /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/model' or vendor diagnostic tools)Affected if The firmware version is any version of the affected chipsets (all versions are vulnerable)
-
Assess network exposureReview firewall rules, network ACLs, and device accessibility to determine if the device is directly reachable from untrusted networks on ports used for TLS (443, etc.) or IKE (500, 4500)Affected if The device is network-accessible and can receive TLS or IKE connections from untrusted sources
You are affected if your device uses a listed Qualcomm APQ chipset (Apq8009, Apq8009w, Apq8017, Apq8037, Apq8053, Apq8096au, Aqt1000, or Ar8031) and has SSL/TLS or IKE authentication enabled, since all firmware versions of these chipsets contain the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply firmware updates provided by Qualcomm and distributed through device manufacturers. Until patches are available, restrict network exposure of affected devices and monitor for anomalous TLS/IKE traffic patterns.
- Consultation16.0 h
- Implementation40.0 h
- Testing24.0 h
- Review / QA12.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $25,856.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-35083 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-35083 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data