CVE-2021-35486
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Nokia IMPACT through 19.11.2.10-20210118042150283 allows a remote attacker to import and overwrite the entire application configuration. Specifically, in /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import, neither the X-CSRF-NONCE HTTP header nor the CSRF-NONCE cookie is validated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNokia IMPACT versions through 19.11.2.10 contain a CSRF vulnerability in the /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import endpoint where neither the X-CSRF-NONCE HTTP header nor the CSRF-NONCE cookie is validated, allowing remote attackers to trick authenticated users into importing and overwriting the entire application configuration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 19.11.2.10-20210118042150283CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Nokia IMPACT installation and versionCheck the product version in the Nokia IMPACT administrative interface or system information page. Look for version numbers in the format 19.11.x.x or confirm the exact build number.Affected if The installed version is 19.11.2.10 or any earlier version (versions through 19.11.2.10-20210118042150283 are affected)
-
Confirm the /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import endpoint existsAccess the Nokia IMPACT web interface and navigate to the configuration import functionality, or verify the presence of this REST endpoint through API documentation or network traffic analysis.Affected if The /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import endpoint is accessible in the deployment
-
Test for missing X-CSRF-NONCE header validationSend a POST request to /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import without the X-CSRF-NONCE header and observe if the request is accepted. Use a tool like curl or Burp Suite to remove the header and check the response.Affected if The endpoint accepts requests without the X-CSRF-NONCE header (vulnerable condition)
-
Test for missing CSRF-NONCE cookie validationSend a POST request to /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import without the CSRF-NONCE cookie and observe if the request is accepted. Compare behavior with requests that include a valid CSRF-NONCE cookie.Affected if The endpoint accepts requests without the CSRF-NONCE cookie (vulnerable condition)
-
Compare CSRF protection on other endpointsTest other endpoints in the IMPACT application that do enforce CSRF protection (if known). Verify whether they require both X-CSRF-NONCE header and CSRF-NONCE cookie, and confirm the import endpoint does not enforce the same requirements.Affected if Other endpoints enforce CSRF tokens but /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import does not (confirms the specific vulnerability)
A user is affected if they are running Nokia IMPACT version 19.11.2.10 or earlier AND the /ui/rest-proxy/entity/import endpoint accepts requests without validating both the X-CSRF-NONCE header and the CSRF-NONCE cookie.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement and enforce CSRF token validation by requiring and verifying both the X-CSRF-NONCE header and CSRF-NONCE cookie on the import endpoint, following the same validation pattern used elsewhere in the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-35486 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-35486 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data