CVE-2021-3553
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the EPPUpdateService of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools allows an attacker to use the Endpoint Protection relay as a proxy for any remote host. This issue affects: Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools versions prior to 6.6.27.390; versions prior to 7.1.2.33. Bitdefender Unified Endpoint for Linux versions prior to 6.2.21.160. Bitdefender GravityZone versions prior to 6.24.1-1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn SSRF vulnerability exists in the EPPUpdateService of Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools, allowing attackers to abuse the Endpoint Protection relay as a proxy to make requests to arbitrary remote hosts. The service lacks proper validation of user-supplied URLs, enabling network-based attacks and potential internal network reconnaissance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.2.21.160>= 6.6.27.0, < 6.6.27.390>= 7.0.0.00, < 7.1.2.33= 6.24.1-1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools installationCheck for Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools processes or services running on the system, or look for Bitdefender installation directoriesAffected if The product is installed and running on the endpoint
-
Identify installed product versionUse the product's built-in version check mechanism, About dialog, or registry/command-line query to obtain the exact installed version numberAffected if The version falls within < 6.2.21.160; >= 6.6.27.0 and < 6.6.27.390; or >= 7.0.0.00 and < 7.1.2.33
-
Check for Bitdefender GravityZone versionIf using GravityZone console or agents, verify the GravityZone version numberAffected if The GravityZone version equals 6.24.1-1
-
Confirm EPPUpdateService is present and enabledCheck if the EPPUpdateService Windows service or Linux daemon is installed and enabled on the endpointAffected if The EPPUpdateService component is present and operational on the system
The environment is affected if Bitdefender Endpoint Security Tools or GravityZone is installed with a version matching the affected ranges and the EPPUpdateService component is active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.21.1606.6.27.3907.1.2.33
Upgrade to fixed versions of affected Bitdefender products (6.6.27.390 or 7.1.2.33 for Endpoint Security Tools, 6.2.21.160 for Unified Endpoint for Linux, 6.24.1-1 for GravityZone) to patch the vulnerable EPPUpdateService component.
Endpoint Security Tools: 6.6.27.390, 7.1.2.33, or 6.2.21.160 (Linux) | GravityZone: 6.24.1-1
- 1. Identify the currently installed Bitdefender product (Endpoint Security Tools for Windows/Linux or GravityZone) and its exact version number
- 2. For Endpoint Security Tools: If running version < 6.2.21.160 (Linux), upgrade to 6.2.21.160 or later
- 3. For Endpoint Security Tools: If running version >= 6.6.27.0 and < 6.6.27.390, upgrade to version 6.6.27.390 or later
- 4. For Endpoint Security Tools: If running version >= 7.0.0.00 and < 7.1.2.33, upgrade to version 7.1.2.33 or later
- 5. For GravityZone: If running version 6.24.1-1 or prior, upgrade to version 6.24.1-1 (or latest stable release)
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the product version in the Bitdefender management console
- 7. Confirm the EPPUpdateService has been patched and SSRF vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-3553 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-3553 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data