CVE-2021-3583
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Ansible, where a user's controller is vulnerable to template injection. This issue can occur through facts used in the template if the user is trying to put templates in multi-line YAML strings and the facts being handled do not routinely include special template characters. This flaw allows attackers to perform command injection, which discloses sensitive information. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality and integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA template injection vulnerability exists in Ansible where facts containing special template characters can execute arbitrary commands when used in multi-line YAML strings. An attacker who controls fact data or can influence what facts are collected can inject commands that execute on the Ansible controller, exposing sensitive information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.2< 2.9.23< 3.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Ansible versionRun 'ansible --version' or 'ansible-playbook --version' to see the installed versionAffected if Version is Ansible Engine < 2.9.23, Ansible Tower < 3.7.0, or Ansible Automation Platform = 1.2
-
Identify multi-line YAML template usageSearch playbooks for '| from_yaml' or '| from_yaml_all' filters applied to variables or facts, especially in multi-line YAML string contexts (| or >)Affected if Playbooks contain multi-line YAML template filters processing fact data without sanitization
-
Review custom and gathered factsInspect /etc/ansible/facts.d/ or custom fact paths for any fact data that could contain user-controlled content or special Jinja2 template charactersAffected if Custom facts can be influenced by untrusted users or contain unsanitized template syntax
You are affected if running a vulnerable Ansible version AND using facts in multi-line YAML template contexts like | from_yaml filters without input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.9.233.7.0
Upgrade Ansible to the patched version. Additionally, audit playbooks for multi-line YAML template usage and implement input validation/sanitization on facts before using them in Jinja2 templates.
Ansible Engine: 2.9.23+ | Ansible Tower: 3.7.0+ | Ansible Automation Platform: 1.2.1+
- 1. Identify the current Ansible Engine, Tower, or Automation Platform version in use by checking the package manager or tower-cli version command
- 2. For Ansible Engine: Upgrade to version 2.9.23 or later using the appropriate package manager (e.g., `pip install --upgrade ansible==2.9.23` or your system package manager)
- 3. For Ansible Tower: Upgrade to version 3.7.0 or later following the standard Tower upgrade procedure documented in the official Red Hat Ansible Tower upgrade guide
- 4. For Ansible Automation Platform: Upgrade to version 1.2.1 or later following the AAP upgrade documentation
- 5. After upgrade, verify the Ansible version with `ansible --version` to confirm the patch was applied
- 6. Test critical playbooks to ensure functionality is maintained after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-3583 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-3583 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data